Have you noticed systemic absorption of RU58841?
    Treatment 11/14/2025

    At a glance
    In this question or advice post, the primary subjects mentioned are
    💊 Dutasteride (oral) a little bit more than a year
    💊 Minoxidil (oral) a little bit more than a year
    💧 RU58841 (topical)
    the tone is 😐 neutral with limited progress results.

    Other terms

    The conversation discusses using RU58841 as a topical treatment for hair loss, with some users reporting no systemic issues. The original poster is considering RU58841 due to limited progress with dutasteride and oral minoxidil.
    View this post in the Community →

    Similar Community Posts Join

    5 / 1000+ results

      community Wtf have we been doing for the last 30 years

      in Treatment  548 upvotes 1 year ago
      Hair loss treatments like finasteride, minoxidil, and dutasteride work but have side effects. A permanent cure is still not available due to the complexity of hair loss and limited investment.

      community Dermarolling is a bit sad innit?

      in Microneedling  232 upvotes 4 years ago
      Hair loss treatments discussed include dermarolling, minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841. Some users find dermarolling sad, while others mention the complexity of biological systems and limited research funding for hair loss.

      community What’s a better combo: RU + fluridil vs RU + topical spiro vs RU + alfatradiol?

      in Treatment  1 upvotes 1 day ago
      The conversation is about choosing an additional topical treatment for hair loss, with options being fluridil, topical spiro, or alfatradiol, alongside existing treatments like dutasteride, oral minoxidil, latanoprost, and RU58841. Opinions vary on the effectiveness of adding these topicals, with some suggesting RU58841 is sufficient.

    Related Research

    6 / 765 results