Performance Evaluation of the Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT-4) on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination

    Ting Wang, Arch G. Mainous, Keith Stelter, Thomas R. O’Neill, Warren P. Newton
    TLDR GPT-4 performs well on medical exams but still needs human doctors for critical thinking.
    In the study, GPT-4 showed high accuracy and rapid learning abilities on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination, aligning with prior research on its potential to aid clinical decision-making. However, the analysis of GPT-4's incorrect responses underscores the crucial role of physicians' critical thinking and lifelong learning, highlighting the necessity of the human element in effectively utilizing AI in medical contexts.
    Discuss this study in the Community →