Comparative Analysis of Labeling and Claim Substantiation Requirements for Herbal Hair Products Across Different Regulatory Jurisdictions

The review examines the regulatory differences for herbal hair products in regions such as the US, EU, India, China, ASEAN, and Canada, focusing on labeling, claim substantiation, and consumer protection. It finds that these differences affect marketing strategies and product quality, with some areas classifying these products as cosmetics and others as over-the-counter drugs or traditional medicines. The study calls for global standardization and stricter claim substantiation to improve consumer safety and marketability. Despite the regulatory diversity, there is a trend towards convergence due to global trade and consumer awareness. The document emphasizes the need for stronger botanical standardization, robust clinical evidence, and harmonized regulations to enhance consumer safety and facilitate international trade.