Roop Singh, Rajesh Rohilla, Raj Kumar Dhayal, Rajeev Sen, P. K. Sehgal
We don't know much about this study yet.
We're maintaining the world's largest resposity of hair loss
research. You can help out the community by
sending a PDF of this study here
.
Not sure how to get a study's PDF? You can email the authors
of the study.
Someone's brother tried Platelet-richplasma (PRP) for hair loss; it had minimal effect on hair but improved skin appearance. Microneedling at home was suggested as a more sustainable alternative.
A 27-year-old male experiencing hair loss post-Covid is considering PRP (platelet-richplasma) therapy. He's seeking personal experiences about the process, particularly regarding pain levels, despite his dermatologist's assurance of using local anesthesia.
Platelet-richplasma (PRP) therapy for hair loss is expensive, painful, and often ineffective, with mixed reviews on its benefits. Alternatives like minoxidil, finasteride, and hair transplants are suggested as more reliable options.
PRP treatment for hair loss shows some evidence of effectiveness, with HT surgeons using it post-op to promote growth. Microneedling is mentioned as a cheaper alternative.
Microneedling and Platelet-RichPlasma (PRP) are equally effective for treating androgenetic alopecia, with no additional benefits from PRP over microneedling. Both treatments are safe and well-tolerated.
24 citations
,
November 2017 in “Aesthetic Plastic Surgery”
All types of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) can treat hair loss, but homologous PRP works best due to its higher platelet count and growth factors from multiple donors.