The post is about using different solutions for RU58841, a treatment for hair loss. The user is asking for opinions on the effectiveness of different vehicles and dosages.
A 21-year-old male with a thyroid condition noticed his hair thinning uniformly without a receding hairline. He is considering using a 5ARI to prevent further baldness if he starts TRT.
Mixing RU58841 with a solution for hair loss treatment, with suggestions to use propylene glycol and ethanol instead of k&b solution due to scalp irritation. Recommendations include using ketoconazole shampoo for itchiness and considering oral minoxidil if topical causes irritation.
The user is using Dutasteride, Nizoral, and RU58841 for hair loss and is considering mixing RU58841 with Stemoxydine for better scalp coverage but is concerned about the potential degradation of RU58841 when mixed with a water-based solution. They are seeking advice on the feasibility of this mixture.
The user is considering switching from topical finasteride to RU58841 or KX826 due to side effects like low libido and ED. They are also using oral minoxidil and considering low-dose saw palmetto to maintain their hairline.
The user noticed baby hair growth and thicker hair after using minoxidil, rosemary, and a dermaroller for two months and plans to start finasteride soon. Another user suggests cutting hair to the same length for better comparison.
RU58841 may cause heart-related side effects like palpitations and chest pain, though evidence is mostly anecdotal. Users report mixed experiences, with some stopping due to side effects and others using it without issues, but concerns about its safety and sourcing remain.
Amplifica is testing a compound called AMP-303 for hair loss, but it's not Scube3 or osteopontin. The timing for the results from the clinical trial is unknown.
A user is exploring personalized topical formulations for hair loss from Roots By Genetics Art, specifically interested in the GA-5 Power Restore formulation containing dutasteride, minoxidil, and other ingredients. They seek opinions on the effectiveness and value of these products.
A user is seeking a hair loss formula containing Redensyl and Capixyl without caffeine, Saw Palmetto, or other herbs. They want recommendations for such a product.
RU58841 showed promise for treating androgenic alopecia but research was halted due to financial and organizational changes. There were no significant safety concerns reported in human trials.
A 27-year-old male is experiencing a recurring pattern of hair loss after 5 months of using oral minoxidil and finasteride, despite initial success. He is considering using topical androgen receptor blockers like RU58841, pyrilutamide, or clascoterone to address potential androgen receptor hypersensitivity.
A 27-year-old male is experiencing hair loss and dandruff, despite trying various treatments like cortisone, diflucan, and natural remedies. He is considering shaving his head and is seeking advice on the "Big 3" treatment, which includes Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841.
A 26-year-old is considering switching from a regimen of minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841 to possibly include pyrilutamide due to insufficient results in slowing hair loss. They are seeking advice on whether to add pyrilutamide or replace RU58841 with it, considering cost and effectiveness.
RU58841, combined with Dutasteride and topical Minoxidil, is helping users slow hair loss. Long-term users report positive results without significant side effects.
A 19-year-old male is experiencing accelerated hair recession after two months on oral Dutasteride, despite no noticeable shedding, while also using topical Minoxidil and Finasteride. He is unsure if the treatment is effective and is unable to access RU58841.
The conversation discusses using 2-deoxy-d-ribose (2DDR) for hair regrowth, with users sharing mixed experiences and side effects like hair loss in new areas and increased anxiety. The original poster plans to continue testing and comparing it to minoxidil, noting potential instability in 2DDR formulations.
RU58841 for hair loss, discussing sources, application methods, and carriers like PG + ethanol or liquid minoxidil. Users share experiences with premixed solutions and powder forms, noting price differences and storage importance.
A user is seeking a pharmacy to compound a topical solution containing Minoxidil, Finasteride, Alfatradiol, Melatonin, Latanoprost, and either RU58841 or Pyrilutamide. They prefer a professional compounding lab over DIY methods.
Dutasteride 0.5 mg significantly reduces both scalp and hair follicle DHT, with a greater reduction in hair follicle DHT. The discussion questions which reduction is more important for androgenetic alopecia and diffuse thinning.
The user is seeking a topical spray combining finasteride, minoxidil, and RU58841 or dutasteride due to side effects from oral treatments. They believe an all-in-one topical solution would be easier for long-term use.
The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically the use of RU58841 by individuals who did not respond to dutasteride. Users share experiences with maintaining hair using RU58841 and mention trying pyrilutamide and the upcoming availability of pp405.
User used sublingual minoxidil for 5 months and saw progress. Also used topical dutasteride, alfatradiol, tretinoin, and reduced oral finasteride dose.
The user experienced hair regrowth with oral minoxidil and finasteride but faced aggressive hair loss after developing IBS, questioning if the condition affects medication absorption. They are considering switching to topical treatments.
The conversation discusses biannual SCUBE3 injections and microneedling as treatments for hair loss. Specific treatments mentioned include Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841.
The user is using Minoxidil 5% foam in the morning and a Minoxidil 5% + Finasteride 1% solution in the evening for hair loss. They are seeking advice on additional topical treatments to use midday, such as caffeine serums, peptides, Redensyl, or natural anti-inflammatories.
AHK-cu peptides are discussed for hair growth, with users comparing them to GHK-cu peptides and sharing sources to buy. AHK-cu is noted as more expensive, and users express interest in finding cheaper, reliable vendors.