Search
for

    Sort by

    Community Join

    360-390 / 1000+ results

      community What makes breezula different than formula 82f?

      in Question  9 upvotes 6 years ago
      Breezula (clascoterone) and Formula 82F (topical finasteride) are treatments for hair loss that block DHT differently; Breezula competes with DHT at the hormone receptor site without systemic effects, while 82F inhibits the enzyme that converts testosterone to DHT. Breezula may work for those who don't respond to finasteride and vice versa.

      community Actifolic RU58841 and others Scam?

      in Treatment  4 upvotes 3 years ago
      Actifolic's RU58841 and Pyri products are perceived as ineffective, with users reporting no side effects or improvements, suggesting possible quality issues. Users recommend alternative sources and emphasize the importance of timing when using RU58841 with Minoxidil.

      community Cosmo Pharma 2025 Investor Day Report

      in Research/Science  5 upvotes 9 months ago
      Cosmo Pharma plans to release Breezula, a hair loss treatment, with expected FDA approval in 2027, but concerns arise over its high potential cost of $225/month. Users express skepticism about its effectiveness compared to cheaper alternatives like finasteride and minoxidil.

      community Clascoterone phase 3 results are out!

      in Treatment  79 upvotes 4 months ago
      Clascoterone phase 3 results show promising improvements in hair count, but concerns about high costs and lack of detailed data remain. Users compare it to existing treatments like Minoxidil and Finasteride, expressing skepticism about its accessibility and effectiveness.

      community So we’re just ok with taking a research chemical now?

      in Treatment  180 upvotes 5 years ago
      The conversation discusses the use of RU58841, a non-FDA approved research chemical for hair loss, with mixed opinions on its safety and effectiveness. Some users are willing to try it as a last resort after other treatments like Minoxidil and Finasteride failed, while others express concerns about potential long-term side effects and lack of official research.

      community Estimate of GT20029 on the grey market?

      in Technology  9 upvotes 2 years ago
      The conversation is about when GT20029, a hair loss treatment, might be available on the grey market, with users discussing the challenges of compounding it and speculating it might be available after phase 2 results, similar to pyri. Specific treatments mentioned are pyri, RU58841, and GT20029.

      community How has your experience been with RU58841?

      in Treatment  4 upvotes 3 weeks ago
      RU58841 is used for hair loss, with some users reporting decreased shedding and preserved hairlines. Concerns about safety and side effects like heart issues are noted, and some combine it with finasteride and minoxidil for better results.

      community Does anyone know of the actual effectiveness of the DP2 inhibitors?

      in Question  5 upvotes 8 years ago
      Setipiprant and Fevipiprant are questioned for their effectiveness in hair maintenance, with skepticism due to lack of convincing results beyond vellus hair growth. The user is satisfied with Minoxidil and Finasteride but is curious about the potential of DP2 inhibitors.

      community Anyone tried switching from RU to Pyrilutamide (KX-826)

      in Product  8 upvotes 3 months ago
      The conversation discusses switching from RU58841 to pyrilutamide for hair loss treatment, with users generally recommending staying on RU58841 if it is effective. RU58841 is sourced from GeneTherica, which ships worldwide.

      community Black market pp405? Title title

      in Treatment  8 upvotes 3 months ago
      PP405 is likely fake, and JXL069 is an unrefined prototype with unknown side effects. It's advised to wait for the official PP405 release.

      community What's your thoughts on Pyrilutamide

      in Product  7 upvotes 4 months ago
      The conversation is about using pyrilutamide and RU58841 as topical solutions to prevent hair loss. Pyrilutamide is considered safer but less potent than RU58841, which some users find effective despite potential side effects like heart palpitations.

      community No side effects on pyrilutamide / KX-826 so far

      in Research/Science  207 upvotes 4 years ago
      User TopBack56 and friends tried pyrilutamide (KX-826) for hair loss without experiencing negative side effects. They observed fine vellus hairs but no thick hair growth yet, and plan to add GT20029 to their regime after safety trials.

      community Should we give up on Breezula?

      in Research/Science  10 upvotes 4 months ago
      Breezula's potential as a hair loss treatment is debated, with some seeing promise despite delays, while others suggest alternatives like Pyrilutamide. Breezula is compared to topical finasteride, with hopes for a better side effect profile.

      community Setipiprant/PGE2 feedbacks?

      in Question  4 upvotes 7 years ago
      The conversation discusses using PGE2 as a hair growth stimulant, comparing it to minoxidil, and considering the addition of Setipiprant. Concerns about side effects like skin damage and cost are also mentioned.

      community Pyrilutamide - your experience?

      in Product  12 upvotes 3 years ago
      The conversation is about the lack of improvement in hair loss after using Pyrilutamide for 14 weeks, with the original poster unable to use Finasteride due to depression. Replies suggest that Pyrilutamide, like RU58841, may not work for everyone, and a more potent drug is being developed by Kintor.

      community PG causing irritation when applying RU

      in Research/Science 2 years ago
      The user is experiencing irritation from using PG with RU58841 and is seeking alternative solutions like K&B in the UK. They report redness, itchiness, and flaky skin from the current treatment.

      community HLT Megathread on HMI-115 (key takeaways in comments)

      in Research/Science  39 upvotes 3 years ago
      HMI-115, a newly discovered hair loss treatment that could potentially be effective for those with diffuse thinning and telogen effluvium. It is based on prolactin receptor antagonist signaling and has already undergone Phase I trials in women, with potential commercialization by 2027.

      community who in here has used ru58841 , and how did it go

      in Treatment  7 upvotes 3 months ago
      RU58841 had mixed results for hair regrowth, with some users experiencing no change and others noting regrowth but also side effects like libido issues and chest pain. Some users combined it with other treatments like finasteride and dutasteride, with varying effectiveness.