Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN) may reduce inflammation in alopecia conditions. It is discussed as a potential adjunct treatment with finasteride or dutasteride for androgenic alopecia.
A user has been using a 5% RU58841 solution for hair loss without much result and is considering increasing to an 8% solution to improve outcomes. They are unsure if they should increase the concentration or wait longer for results.
A user is considering mixing 5% topical minoxidil with Alpecin Caffeine Liquid to enhance its effect, while also using oral finasteride. They seek feedback on potential efficacy loss and downsides of this mixture.
Men discussing hair loss treatments, including bicalutamide, cyproterone acetate, dutasteride, minoxidil, and RU58841. They share experiences and concerns about side effects like infertility, liver health, and feminization.
The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, including Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841. It highlights an interview with Stemson Therapeutics CEO Geoff Hamilton about advancements in hair cloning technology.
Fluridil was abandoned due to its weak effectiveness and low binding affinity to the androgen receptor, making it less competitive against DHT and testosterone. Users discuss its limited results compared to other treatments like pyrilutamide and RU58841.
New hair loss treatments PP405 and VDPHL01 are discussed with skepticism and hope, alongside existing treatments like minoxidil and finasteride. Users express frustration over limited progress since the 1980s but remain cautiously optimistic.
A user is concerned that prolonged use of valisone (betamethasone) and clotrimazole solution for scalp dermatitis may be causing hair thinning and loss. They noticed thinning in the area where the solution was applied.
The conversation is about the effectiveness of Fluridil (Eucapil) for hair loss compared to RU58841, with the original poster considering Fluridil a safer and potentially more effective alternative.
Amplifica starting clinical trials for new hair loss drug. SCUBE3 protein discovered, stimulates hair growth, could be alternative to Minoxidil and Finasteride.
A woman with AGA and CTE has been taking multiple hair loss treatments including spironolactone, dutasteride, finasteride, bicalutamide, birth control, and minoxidil without success. Steroid injections, however, dramatically and immediately stopped her hair loss, though the effect lasts less than a month.
A user shared their experience with a hair transplant, emphasizing the importance of avoiding caffeine 7 days before the procedure. Ignoring this advice led to reduced effectiveness of the numbing agent, causing significant discomfort during the transplant.
The user is experimenting with taking 1-1.5ml of pure castor oil orally daily as an alternative to minoxidil for hair growth. They aim to find a safer option that promotes overall body and head hair growth without the side effects of minoxidil.
The user is experiencing a greasy and dandruff-prone scalp from using RU58841 with glycerin and is seeking alternative carriers for seborrheic dermatitis. They are also using dutasteride 0.5mg.
The conversation discusses the potential of a new hair loss treatment, GT20029, which may prevent hair loss by destroying androgen receptors on the scalp. Users express hope for the treatment's success and speculate on its usage routine, effectiveness, and possible side effects.
Oral minoxidil is effective for hair loss and unlikely to significantly affect collagen synthesis, making it a safe option without causing premature skin aging. Users report positive hair regrowth without noticeable skin aging.
The conversation discusses the lack of updates on GT20029 for hair loss treatment, with some users noting recent reports indicating ongoing data collection. There are mentions of other treatments like Pyrilutamide and Minoxidil.
The conversation discusses the cost-effectiveness of using premade RU58841 versus making it from powder for hair loss treatment. It also questions whether higher concentrations are more effective for women.
A 19-year-old is experiencing crown thinning after three months on finasteride and minoxidil, hoping it's just a shedding phase. They also use a dermaroller weekly and seek hair regrowth and stabilization.
RU58841, a potential hair loss treatment, was not commercialized due to marketability issues and lack of long-term safety data. Concerns about its formulation and delivery methods further complicate its use.
The conversation is about adding crushed bicalutamide or spironolactone to a topical mix with finasteride and minoxidil to suppress testosterone in hair follicles, similar to what RU58841 does. The user cannot obtain RU58841 in their country and is seeking advice on this alternative approach for hair loss treatment.
An 18-year-old is concerned about potential balding and seeks advice. They are unsure if their hairline is a widow's peak or if they are experiencing hair loss.
A new brand is seeking 10 U.S.-based individuals aged 25+ experiencing hair loss to test a topical product containing GHK-Cu and Acetyl Tetrapeptide-3. Participants must not be using other treatments like finasteride or minoxidil and will provide feedback and photos.
The trial for TDM-105795 has been completed, and it was in phase 2A. The discussion seeks input on the next phases, 2B or 3, based on safety and efficacy.
Topical Minoxidil and RU58841 can make hair look brittle and thin, possibly due to the propylene glycol in their solutions. Some users experience side effects like heart palpitations with RU58841, while others have no issues.
The post and conversation are about a hair loss treatment stack without finasteride or dutasteride. The suggested treatments include Alfatradiol, Koshine826, Ketoconazole lotion, Minoxidil, microneedling, Tretinoin, and Stemoxydine.
The user has tried many hair loss treatments including dutasteride, oral and topical minoxidil, topical finasteride, PRP, and microneedling without much success and is now using RU58841, seeing initial vellus hair growth but no further improvement after 5 months. They are inquiring about the effectiveness of RU58841 after 6-12 months of use.
RU58841 showed promise for treating androgenic alopecia but research was halted due to financial and organizational changes. There were no significant safety concerns reported in human trials.