RU58841 and Minoxidil can cause heart-related side effects like chest pain and heart racing. Pyrilutamide is suggested as a safer alternative, though it's new and costly.
The conversation is about using RU58841 and microneedling (1.5mm) for hair loss. The user seeks advice on whether to avoid applying RU58841 on microneedling days to prevent it from becoming systemic.
The user is excited about starting Clascoterone 5% for hair loss, a DHT blocker, and expects better results when combined with Minoxidil. The prescription costs $199 for 30 ml or $353 for 60 ml, and the user plans to cover the cost by driving for Uber.
RT1640, a combination of cyclosporin A, minoxidil, and RT175, is discussed as a potential treatment for hair regrowth and repigmentation. The unique formulation aims to enhance hair follicle growth and restore hair pigment without the negative side effects of immunosuppressants.
The conversation is about the anticipation and uncertainty regarding the release of GT20029 Phase 2 results for hair loss treatment. Users express hope for its effectiveness and minimal side effects compared to other treatments like Pyri and HMI115.
The conversation is about the safety of using a dermastamp at 0.25mm depth twice a day when applying Minoxidil. The user seeks confirmation on whether this practice is safe despite mixed opinions.
The user reported significant hair recovery using topical minoxidil combined with the Age-R Booster-H-device, alongside oral finasteride and weekly dermaroller use. The device improved minoxidil absorption, leading to visible new hair growth.
The user has been using Minoxidil and finasteride with success and is now trying Dualgen-5R with retinoic acid but without finasteride, along with microneedling. They plan to share results in 5-6 months.
A new potential hair loss treatment called HMI-115, and the cost of this treatment which may be expensive due to production costs but could be competitive with other treatments such as hair transplants.
A 26-year-old male is still experiencing hair loss after a year of using Dutasteride and is considering using CB0301 (Breezula) to block all androgens on his follicles. He is looking for a reliable source to purchase CB0301 and inquires about the availability of a premade solution.
The conversation is about skepticism regarding new hair loss treatments until they are FDA approved. People have been joking about treatments being 5-7 years away for decades.
The conversation is about a user seeking help with hair regrowth treatments, specifically mentioning Setipiprant, Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841. The user is trying to contact forum members for guidance on making and using these treatments.
PP405 is likely a scam, with concerns about its legitimacy and safety, as it may cause unintended tissue growth. Users suggest sticking to known treatments like finasteride and minoxidil.
Pelage plans to release phase 2 results and start phase 3 trials for PP405 in 2050, but skepticism remains due to past delays and unfulfilled promises. Users express frustration over the lack of progress in hair loss treatments, mentioning Minoxidil, finasteride, RU58841, CB-03-01, and Fluridil.
PP405 is suspected to be a scam, with users doubting its legitimacy and effectiveness. Many recommend using proven treatments like finasteride and minoxidil.
Breezula's phase 3 enrollment for hair loss treatment is complete, but results have not been published, causing skepticism about its progress. Some users express doubt about its future, suggesting it may be reserved for exclusive use.
The conversation is about making topical finasteride using stemoxydine as a carrier. The user is considering buying Redken Cerafill Hair Re-Densifying Treatment (Stemoxydine) 90ml for this purpose.
KX-826 is undergoing Phase III trials in China as a potential treatment for male pattern baldness, with some users considering it as an alternative or addition to finasteride and dutasteride. Opinions on its effectiveness vary, with some users reporting positive results and others finding it expensive and ineffective.
Clascoterone is being discussed for hair loss, but its current acne formulation may not be suitable for scalp use due to potential skin irritation and lower dosage compared to Breezula. Users mention other treatments like finasteride, minoxidil, and pyrilutamide, with some expressing skepticism about clascoterone's effectiveness for hair loss.
12 companies having drugs or therapies in clinical trials during 2023, with various molecules and phases of trial; the probability that some may fail; and progress being made in the field.
GT20029 and PP405 are discussed as potential alternatives or complements to finasteride for hair loss treatment. GT20029 is entering phase 3 trials, while PP405 is seen as promising for regrowing hair and possibly eliminating the need for other treatments.
The conversation is about the effectiveness and production of GT20029, a drug being developed as a topical androgen receptor degrader for hair loss, and whether it can fully degrade androgen receptors or only partially. It also discusses the drug's potential unique working mechanism and synthesis by a company called Anagen.
The conversation is about the effectiveness of the Laduora duo massage brush for hair regrowth using vibration and red light, and whether the vitamin gel pods make sense. Specific treatments like Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841 are not mentioned.
The potential release date for results from a phase 2 trial of Pyrilutamide, a hair loss treatment that combines Minoxidil, Finasteride and RU58841. It was agreed that the results are expected to be released in June 2022.
Exploring different treatments for hair loss, such as cosmeRNA and HMI-115 which are small interference messenger RNA that inhibits the DHT receptor and an antibody that binds to the prolactin (PRL) receptor respectively; and researching mechanism and environment of hyperresponders.
A user switched from a 1.5 mm derma roller to an adjustable dermastamp for microneedling to treat hair loss and found it less painful and more effective. Some users prefer different depths and tools like the Dr.Pen for microneedling, while others debate the necessity of depth and tool type.