The conversation discusses the differences between KB solution and PG + Ethanol solution for RU58841 in treating hair loss. It compares the effectiveness and properties of these two solutions.
Choosing between KB and PG solutions for applying RU58841, considering factors like scalp oiliness and absorption. Some users prefer KB for being gentler, while others use PG and recommend washing hair before application for better results.
RU58841 is not FDA approved, and users are discussing its availability and legitimacy in India, with some mentioning brands like Vantanex and Capomil. One user warns about the risk of gyno from RU58841, advising to stop use at the first sign of sensitivity.
RU58841 should be stored in the refrigerator to maintain efficacy, but it remains stable for over two years even without refrigeration. A user prefers using Minoxidil and finasteride instead.
The conversation discusses the potential of a new hair loss treatment, GT20029, which targets androgen receptors in the scalp and is in phase 1 trials in China. Users express hope that this treatment will be more effective than current options like Minoxidil and Finasteride.
The user humorously describes trying various hair loss treatments, including minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841, with a satirical twist involving psychedelic experiences and imaginary entities. They mistakenly used LSD instead of RU58841 and plan to continue experimenting with other substances.
The user shared progress pictures after three months of using RU58841, finasteride, and OM (oxidative stress modulators) for hair loss treatment. They haven't noticed much change but are seeking feedback on their results.
Kintor Pharma has finished enrolling the first patient in a Phase III trial for KX-826, a treatment for androgenetic alopecia (AGA). One user has set a reminder to check back on the topic in a year.
The post discusses the user's experience with hair loss treatment RU58841, which was tested for quality and found to be 96+% pure. The conversation includes various responses, with some users questioning the safety of the product and others expressing satisfaction with the test results.
The conversation is about frustration over the delay in phase 2 results for a hair loss treatment called GT20029. One user suspects the treatment may have failed.
RU58841 for hair loss, with users discussing sources, effectiveness, and side effects. Some users report side effects and question the long-term safety of RU58841.
The conversation discusses a 4-month hair regrowth protocol that includes finasteride (1.25mg), RU58841, dermarolling, ketoconazole, minoxidil, peppermint oil, and fatty acids/oils. Progress pictures are shared to show the results of these treatments.
People shared mixed experiences with RU58841 for hair loss; one person saw no improvement, another had significant gains and uses it with finasteride, while a third had an allergic reaction to the premixed solution. Some mix RU58841 powder into minoxidil themselves.
A 46-year-old man is using minoxidil, finasteride, and derma rolling for hair regrowth but is unsure of the results and considering a hair transplant. Many suggest he looks good bald and recommend continuing treatment or trying scalp micropigmentation.
The user is using finasteride, RU58841, and various natural supplements and treatments like seamoss, fish oil, and black rice water spray to combat hair loss, avoiding minoxidil due to dependency concerns. They report thicker hair and regained confidence, while discussing the potential risks and benefits of RU58841 with others.
The user experienced hair regrowth using a combination of Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841, with Minoxidil used initially and the other treatments added later. The user believes the combination of Finasteride and RU58841 contributed to the regrowth, with RU sourced from MVsupplement.
The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically RU58841, and inquiries about its availability and cost in India. Minoxidil and finasteride are also mentioned as treatments.
A user discussed their hair transplant progress and mentioned using 1mg Finasteride, 5% Topical Minoxidil, and recently starting 5% RU58841. They are seeking advice on whether to use RU58841 at month 4 post-transplant.
A user shared their successful hair loss treatment using RU58841, topical minoxidil, and microneedling, noting significant improvement over three months. They chose RU58841 over finasteride due to personal preference and reported no side effects, while others discussed their experiences with different treatments and supplements.
The conversation discusses skepticism about the effectiveness and formulation of a $10 RU58841 gel from a Korean brand, questioning if ethanol is used to hold the active compounds. Concerns are raised about the feasibility of selling it at such a low price.
User had minor hair transplant in 2020, used Fin since 2008, Min since 2014, and added microneedling in 2022. Routine was irregular with no severe effects.
The conversation is about the potential impact of RU58841 on male fertility, specifically regarding sperm concentration, total count, and motility. The user is curious about the likelihood of RU58841 reducing fertility based on its mechanism of action and comparisons to similar substances.
A group buy for products to treat hair loss, such as Minoxidil, Finasteride and RU58841. Participants are interested in adding more people before ordering the next order.
A user shared their positive experience with a 2000 graft FUE hair transplant by Dr. Ko in Korea, costing $5.4K USD, and expressed satisfaction with the results. Some users praised the outcome, while others criticized the hairline's appearance and technique.
The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841. Concerns are raised about the lack of studies on RU58841 and its potential effects.
Hair loss discussion includes treatments like Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841. Users share experiences and support, mentioning that many people face hair thinning.
The conversation is about a user trying to fund lab testing for RU58841 to verify its legitimacy, as there are doubts about its effectiveness. Some users express skepticism about RU58841, suggesting alternatives like KX-826.