Search
for

    Sort by

    Community Join

    990-1000 / 1000+ results

      community Is Pyrilutamide the real deal and if so when will it actually be available?

      in Chat  20 upvotes 3 years ago
      Pyrilutamide, a potential hair loss treatment that is currently in development and may be available soon; an androgen receptor degrader which is also being developed as a potential treatment for hair loss; and the comparison between Pyrilutamide, finasteride, minoxidil, and RU58841.

      community Thoughts on the future of pp405?

      in Research/Science  43 upvotes 8 months ago
      PP405 is considered a promising hair loss treatment, potentially replacing minoxidil but not finasteride. Users are hopeful for future treatments like GT20029 and VDPHL01, while remaining cautious about effectiveness and side effects.

      community Musely's topical hair solution

      in Finasteride/Dutasteride  6 upvotes 3 years ago
      The conversation discusses a topical hair loss treatment containing 0.1% dutasteride, 6% minoxidil, tretinoin, and ketoconazole. The user is asking for opinions on the effectiveness of this solution.

      community Great News! Hair Growth Treatment will be smooth in the future

      in Research/Science  179 upvotes 9 months ago
      Oleic acid, microneedling, and emu oil are discussed as potential hair growth treatments, with some users expressing skepticism about their effectiveness. Minoxidil and finasteride are recommended as current reliable treatments until more proven solutions are available.

      community Pyrilutamide vs Topical Finasteride

      in Finasteride/Dutasteride  5 upvotes 9 months ago
      Topical finasteride is currently more effective than pyrilutamide for hair loss. Combining treatments like topical finasteride and pyrilutamide may enhance results due to different mechanisms.

      community Formula 82M?

      in Question  4 upvotes 7 years ago
      Formula 82M, a minoxidil and retinol liquid, improved hair texture and filled in temples with baby hairs for the user, but its high cost and lack of reviews cause concern. Another user mentioned using a similar product, 82F, which has become less effective and expensive over time.