Search
for

    Sort by

    Community Join

    270-300 / 1000+ results

      community How do you check the purity of Ru or Breezula

      in Product  7 upvotes 4 years ago
      The conversation is about someone wanting to import RU58841 or CB-03-01 from China for hair loss treatment but being concerned about receiving counterfeit products. Specific treatments mentioned are RU58841 and CB-03-01.

      community Difference: GT20029 vs CosmeRNA

      in Treatment  9 upvotes 3 years ago
      GT20029 and CosmeRNA are both potential hair loss treatments; GT20029 breaks down the androgen receptor, while CosmeRNA prevents its production. Continuous use is needed, but less frequently than current treatments like Minoxidil and Finasteride.

      community Using RU58841 instead of finasteride.

      in Treatment  2 upvotes 3 months ago
      The user stopped using finasteride due to side effects and switched to RU58841, which seems to be working for hair regrowth. They are considering RU58841 and minoxidil as long-term treatments, while others discuss the safety and effectiveness of these options.

      community Has my Ru58841 attained degradation?

      in Research/Science 1 year ago
      RU58841 may still be potent after being left unopened for four months if protected from light and air. A user reported hair improvement using RU58841 with minoxidil, without major shedding, over 2.5 years.

      community Any chemists want to manufacture PP405 / JXL069? (Steps inside)

      in Research/Science  88 upvotes 5 months ago
      The conversation discusses the synthesis and potential use of JXL069 and PP405 for hair loss treatment, with skepticism about their effectiveness and concerns about safety. Users mention that JXL069 has shown no results in hair growth, and there is confusion about its identity and effectiveness compared to PP405.

      community Pp405 phase 2a clinical results

      in Research/Science  38 upvotes 9 months ago
      PP405 shows initial promise for treating androgenetic alopecia, with safety confirmed in early trials, but skepticism remains due to limited data. Further trials are needed to determine its true efficacy and potential market impact.

      community Wrap it up everyone. CB-03-01 is another failed treatment

      in Treatment  81 upvotes 6 months ago
      CB-03-01 is considered a failed treatment for hair loss, with future hopes pinned on PP-405 and GT-20029, expected by 2030. Alternatives like hair transplants and SMP are discussed, while some users express frustration over the slow progress of treatments like Breezula.

      community Lowest Effective RU58841 Dose?

      in Treatment  4 upvotes 1 year ago
      RU58841 is discussed as a hair loss treatment, with users considering lower doses like 2.5% to reduce costs. Some users suggest that if already blocking DHT, lower doses might still be effective unless there's high sensitivity to DHT.

      community I think Ru58841 stopped my itching.

      in Chat  4 upvotes 1 year ago
      RU58841 stopped scalp itching for the user, providing relief from persistent itchiness associated with hair loss. Some users reported side effects like chest pain, while others found relief with different treatments like mometasone.

      community Question about RU58841 in minoxidil

      in Minoxidil  5 upvotes 5 years ago
      The user is considering adding RU58841 to liquid minoxidil without propylene glycol (PG) due to an allergy and is asking if this combination is effective and if PG is necessary. They have been using finasteride and minoxidil foam, plan to use RU58841 with liquid minoxidil in the evening, and continue finasteride.

      community Joining clinical study for Clascoterone (Breezula)

      in Research/Science  7 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation is about a user considering joining a clinical study for Clascoterone (Breezula) after experiencing no results with topical finasteride and minoxidil, and side effects from oral finasteride. The user is seeking advice on clinical study participation and experiences.

      community started RU58841 today and am panicing

      in Treatment  8 upvotes 2 years ago
      A user started using RU58841 for hair loss and experienced anxiety and physical discomfort. Other users suggested avoiding the treatment due to similar side effects and recommended alternative treatments like pyri.

      community What’s more reliable right now, pyrilutamide or RU?

      in Treatment  15 upvotes 3 years ago
      Treatments for hair loss, with the user considering Pyrilutamide and RU58841 as options. It is noted that although Pyrilutamide has been studied more and is allegedly more effective, there are doubts about its authenticity in the market. KX-826 is suggested as an alternative as it has a stronger effect than RU58841 and there is scientific research on it.

      community M37, 0.5mg fin EOD, 5% min topical 2x daily, 5 months

      in Progress Pictures  171 upvotes 2 years ago
      A 37-year-old man treated his hair loss with 0.5mg finasteride every other day and 5% minoxidil twice daily for 5 months, reducing finasteride from 1mg due to side effects. His hair improved significantly, with positive changes visible from all angles, and he experienced no more side effects after the dosage adjustment.

      community What's your thoughts on Pyrilutamide

      in Product  6 upvotes 4 months ago
      The conversation is about using pyrilutamide and RU58841 as topical solutions to prevent hair loss. Pyrilutamide is considered safer but less potent than RU58841, which some users find effective despite potential side effects like heart palpitations.

      community What is the best legit source of RU58841 in the UK?

      in Product  6 upvotes 1 year ago
      A user is seeking a trusted supplier for RU58841 in the UK, expressing doubts about their current source, rudirect, and considering Anagenic and receptorchem. They are asking for recommendations for other suppliers.

      community Research behind RU-58642? Has anyone heard of this?

      in Research/Science  1 upvotes 10 months ago
      RU-58642 is a powerful anti-androgen that was not developed further, possibly due to safety concerns or financial reasons. RU58841 is a topical alternative, but it is less effective than finasteride and dutasteride, and its long-term effects are not well-studied.