A 35-year-old man shares his one-year progress using 1.25 mg oral finasteride and 5% topical minoxidil for hair loss, with no side effects and slight improvement in his front hairline. He also uses keto shampoo twice a week and a 0.5mm roller weekly.
Pyrilutamide from Ligand Chem was used by several individuals to address hair loss, with mixed results and no significant side effects reported. Some users switched to Minoxidil Max for better value, while others noted no hair growth or only a reduction in shedding.
RepliCel has purchased Trichoscience, and they have a video about hair multiplication. The conversation also mentions treatments like Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841.
The user is starting dutasteride mesotherapy and seeks information on checking serum DHT levels in Germany. They previously tried finasteride but experienced unpleasant side effects.
The conversation is about comparing hair loss treatments Pyrilutamide (KX-826) and CB-03-01, discussing their cost, side effects, and effectiveness. The user questions whether to try CB-03-01, which is more expensive and potentially less effective, or switch to the cheaper and possibly better Pyrilutamide.
Long-term RU58841 users discuss its effectiveness, with some finding it not worth the cost compared to other treatments like Dutasteride and Minoxidil. One user experienced side effects from a chemical company product, while another is regrowing hair after stopping RU58841.
The conversation is about choosing a topical antiandrogen for hair loss, with options including RU58841, CB0301, Pyrolutamide, Alfatradiol, and Fluridil. Users discuss their preferences and reasons for selecting specific treatments.
RU58841 should be applied directly to the scalp, ideally once a day, a few hours before bed. Some users experienced side effects like shedding and systemic issues when using RU58841 and Minoxidil together, while others reported no side effects when using RU58841 alone.
The user has been taking 1mg of finasteride daily for a year, maintaining hair density without regrowth. They are considering oral minoxidil for regrowth, avoiding topical minoxidil due to its toxicity to cats, despite concerns about heart side effects.
Hair loss treatments discussed include Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841. A user asks about alfatradiol's availability, public perception, and usage in Germany.
Mometasone Furoate Topical Solution 0.1% is used for hair loss, applied after showering and massaged into the damp scalp. The user is seeking information on its effectiveness for hair loss.
The conversation discusses skepticism about the effectiveness and formulation of a $10 RU58841 gel from a Korean brand, questioning if ethanol is used to hold the active compounds. Concerns are raised about the feasibility of selling it at such a low price.
The conversation discusses how applying topical tretinoin for 5 days can convert 43% of individuals who initially do not respond to minoxidil into responders, enhancing the effect of minoxidil on hair growth. Specific treatments mentioned are minoxidil and tretinoin.
A user is seeking a Minoxidil Response Test kit in the EU without bundled consultations. They mention alternatives like oral minoxidil and tretinoin but prefer the test alone.
Clascoterone's European release is expected in Q4 2026, with FDA approval anticipated by mid-2027. The discussion includes questions about the approval timeline and potential acceleration due to unmet needs.
Calecim (PTT-6) Advanced Hair System is a 6-week hair restoration product using stem cell-derived ingredients to stimulate hair growth. Users are skeptical, calling it overpriced and ineffective, suggesting alternatives like LLLT devices or PRP treatments.
Kintor Pharma completed patient enrollment for a Phase II trial in China for GT20029, a potential new treatment for hair loss. Some believe GT20029 could replace finasteride if effective, while others discuss finasteride's limited efficacy and potential underreported side effects.
Akinfenrawr experienced negative side effects from oral finasteride and RU58841, and is seeking alternative hair loss treatments. They discuss various options, including raloxifene, oral dutasteride, liposomal finasteride, Breezula, Pyrilutamide, SM04554, and sulforaphane, but have concerns about efficacy, availability, and cost.
Breezula shows promise in stabilizing hair loss and potentially promoting regrowth at the one-year mark, offering hope for those who can't tolerate 5AR inhibitors. Its local targeting of androgen receptors could be a significant advancement if it avoids systemic side effects.
The conversation discusses a hair loss treatment regimen including oral dutasteride, oral minoxidil, tadalafil, and the recent addition of RU58841. The user shares experiences with these treatments, noting significant hair regrowth and stabilization, and discusses the cost and preparation of RU58841.
Adding tretinoin can enhance the effectiveness of minoxidil by increasing sulfotransferase levels, making it beneficial for hair growth. However, it may not be necessary if using oral minoxidil.
The conversation is about a user trying to fund lab testing for RU58841 to verify its legitimacy, as there are doubts about its effectiveness. Some users express skepticism about RU58841, suggesting alternatives like KX-826.
The conversation discusses switching from RU58841 to pyrilutamide for hair loss treatment, with users generally recommending staying on RU58841 if it is effective. RU58841 is sourced from GeneTherica, which ships worldwide.
Tretinoin and microneedling both enhance hair growth through different mechanisms, with microneedling being considered safe for long-term use. Optimal microneedling needle length varies, but 0.8 mm is suggested for hair growth, and a Dermastamp is recommended to avoid skin damage.
A user discussed a significant hair recovery using alfatradiol and fluridil but was considered untrustworthy and the post was deleted. They are seeking the original poster's username.
Anageninc stopping the sale of Pyrilutamide due to a cease and desist order from Kintor, with some speculating that it was either a hoax or subpar product.