Hair loss treatments, specifically Pyrilutamide and Minoxidil/Finasteride/RU58841. Participants discussed their experiences with them and the results they have seen so far.
Koshine 826 (Pyrilutamide) has mixed reviews, with some users experiencing side effects like insomnia and others seeing minimal results. Concerns about the company's transparency and lack of progress photos are noted.
KX-826 (Pyrilutamide) being tested in the US for hair loss treatment and that they have found enough people to participate in phase II clinical trials. Other treatments discussed are Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841.
The conversation is about finding non-alcoholic minoxidil options in India due to irritation from propylene glycol-based formulations. Suggestions include Tugain 5% foam, Morr Max 5%, minoxidil gel, and Morr F Aqua plus, with OP avoiding finasteride due to side effects.
A user with diffuse thinning, currently using finasteride, biotin, minoxidil, and nizoral shampoo, is considering a topical solution called "82M" but is skeptical due to its high cost and lack of supporting research. They seek others' experiences with "82M."
The conversation discusses the differences between PG/Ethanol and KB solutions for RU58841 application, focusing on potential scalp irritation. KB solution is suggested for those allergic to PG, though both contain ethanol which can dry the scalp.
A 15% discount is offered on hair research products like RU58841 and TEMPOL at Chemyo.com. The legality of selling these compounds is confirmed by the seller.
Creating a liposomal gel with Pyrilutamide for hair loss to reduce systemic effects, similar to Xyon's gel. The discussion includes concerns about ingredient sourcing and the benefits of targeted topical treatments.
The conversation discusses switching from RU58841 to pyrilutamide for hair loss treatment, with users generally recommending staying on RU58841 if it is effective. RU58841 is sourced from GeneTherica, which ships worldwide.
The user seeks alternatives to Propylene Glycol (PG) for delivering topical finasteride due to scalp irritation. They consider using Propanediol 1,3 and ask for other suggestions.
The user is seeking a topical minoxidil and finasteride combination without propylene glycol due to scalp irritation. They are looking for a supplier in the US.
The conversation is about finding a reasonably priced shampoo with piroctone olamine in the US. The user is cautious about trying new or smaller brands.
The user tried topical dutasteride for 6 months without success and is considering Pyrilutamide as an anti-androgen treatment for hair loss. Other users suggest using 1% Pyrilutamide and combining it with topical dutasteride.
Concerns about the potential systemic effects and safety of PP405 for hair loss, with discussions on its comparison to existing treatments like finasteride and minoxidil. Users express skepticism about untested research chemicals and emphasize the importance of clinical trials to ensure safety and efficacy.
User discusses Pyrilutamide's effectiveness for hair loss, needing more time for results. Others suggest waiting 6-12 months and ask about side effects.
A user discusses their experience with dissolving high concentrations of minoxidil in various ethanol/PG ratios and mentions difficulties with combining it with RU58841. They note that a 5% minoxidil solution remains stable, while higher concentrations tend to precipitate.
Pyluritamide and RU58841 are compared for effectiveness in addition to dutasteride for hair loss treatment. Reddit users report great results with RU58841, but data suggests pyluritamide may have better affinity.
The conversation is about using topical finasteride or dutasteride with a testosterone and NPP cycle for hair loss. The planned treatment includes microneedling, minoxidil, pyrilutamide, and dutasteride applied topically.
RU58841, an anti-androgenic compound, showed early promise for treating alopecia but faced challenges after its patent in 1997. Despite advancing to Phase II trials, safety concerns and financial struggles led Aventis to abandon its development. Proskelia, which later merged into ProStrakan, couldn't prioritize the drug, leading to its eventual stagnation and failure to reach the market.
OP used minoxidil for 15 months and pyrilutamide for 46 days, achieving desired results without side effects. Users discussed alternatives like dutasteride and finasteride, with concerns about side effects like erectile dysfunction.
Fluridil and pyrilutamide are equally effective in stabilizing hair loss, with no regrowth observed. The user also uses dutasteride and minoxidil in their treatment.
PP405 is a new hair loss treatment showing early promise with a 20% hair density increase, but skepticism exists due to past failures of similar treatments like Pyrilutamide, RU58841, and Bimatoprost. Users debate its potential effectiveness, with some hopeful due to Google's involvement, while others urge caution without more evidence.
The user increased their steroid dosage and noticed hair shedding, so they adjusted their regimen by reducing steroid doses and adding oral dutasteride. They are also experimenting with combining RU-58841 and KX-826/pyrilutamide in minoxidil to address hair loss.
The user added Dutasteride to their routine, which reduced hair loss, and is considering reintroducing Pyril at a lower dose of 0.5 ml to save costs. It is suggested that 0.5 ml can still be effective if spread properly.
RU-58841 does not dissolve well in common Minoxidil solutions due to water content, requiring a 70/30 ethanol/propylene glycol mix. Users report using separate solutions for RU-58841 and finasteride/Minoxidil for better results.
FOL-005 claims to be more effective than Minoxidil and Finasteride but lacks anti-DHT properties, leading to potential reduced efficacy over time. Concerns are raised about misleading marketing and the safety of alternative treatments like Pyrilutamide and Clascoterone.
Kintor Pyrilutamide treatment, a potential hair loss treatment that may become available to the public soon. People have been experimenting with using it in topical form, with mixed results and no reported side effects.
RU58841, a potential hair loss treatment, was not commercialized due to marketability issues and lack of long-term safety data. Concerns about its formulation and delivery methods further complicate its use.