The user healthydudenextdoor starting a new topical anti-androgen hair loss treatment, Pyrilutamide, and discussing their current regimen of finasteride and minoxidil.
The conversation discusses the effectiveness of RU58841 and pyrilutamide for hair loss treatment. It seeks personal success or failure stories and scientific data on these treatments.
KX-826/pyrilutamide is undergoing an additional one-year safety and efficacy trial in China after a six-month study. Some participants speculate on the reasons for the extended trial and discuss the potential of other treatments.
Kintor Pyrilutamide treatment, a potential hair loss treatment that may become available to the public soon. People have been experimenting with using it in topical form, with mixed results and no reported side effects.
Treatments for hair loss, including the effectiveness and safety of Pyrilutamide compared to RU58841; experiences using both medications with varying results; and recommendations to try Pyrilutamide instead of RU58841.
The user used 0.5 mL of 0.5 mg of Pyrilutamide for 60 days for hair loss, but didn't notice any hair growth. They shared their hormone panel results and are seeking advice on next steps.
Kintor's Phase II U.S. trials for pyrilutamide and the process of pharmaceutical drugs coming to market, with a reply from someone who has just ordered 500mg of Pyrilutamide to start their own phase trials.
The post and conversation discuss KX-826 (pyrilutamide) for hair loss treatment, with positive remarks about its advertising and authenticity in China. The user changed their perspective after further research and seeing genuine advertising.
The conversation is about adding a low dose of pyrilutamide to a hair loss treatment regimen. Specific treatments mentioned include Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841.
Pyrilutamide's systemic degradation is unclear, unlike fluridil, which becomes inactive in the body. The discussion focuses on whether pyrilutamide shares this property.
The conversation discusses hair regrowth progress after 2.5 months using pyrilutamide and minoxidil. Participants note visible improvement in a short time.
RU58841, an anti-androgenic compound, showed early promise for treating alopecia but faced challenges after its patent in 1997. Despite advancing to Phase II trials, safety concerns and financial struggles led Aventis to abandon its development. Proskelia, which later merged into ProStrakan, couldn't prioritize the drug, leading to its eventual stagnation and failure to reach the market.
The post discusses a new hair loss treatment involving an improved pyri formula that has shown promising results, including thicker hair and a restored hairline, with minimal side effects. The author seeks investors to collaborate with Kintor or acquire the pyri patent, offering equity rewards and complimentary samples for verification.
Pyrilutamide is believed to be more effective than RU58841 and 1 mg finasteride in treating hair loss, with no systemic hormonal effects and the potential to block more than 31% of scalp DHT. It may also antagonize scalp testosterone due to its action as an androgen receptor antagonist.
The user has been using pyrilutamide, topical finasteride, and 15% minoxidil for hair growth for almost 4 years. Despite mixed responses from others, the user reports seeing progress, especially with the addition of pyrilutamide, and plans to continue the regimen.
The conversation questions the lack of feedback on the effectiveness of PGE2 and setipiprant for hair loss, despite their availability. The user is puzzled by the absence of reviews or results, whether positive or negative.
The user added Dutasteride to their routine, which reduced hair loss, and is considering reintroducing Pyril at a lower dose of 0.5 ml to save costs. It is suggested that 0.5 ml can still be effective if spread properly.
Pyrilutamide, a potential hair loss treatment that is currently in development and may be available soon; an androgen receptor degrader which is also being developed as a potential treatment for hair loss; and the comparison between Pyrilutamide, finasteride, minoxidil, and RU58841.
The conversation discusses faith in Pyrilutamide as an effective hair loss treatment and mentions a favorite hair YouTuber who is diligent in research and humorously criticizes others. No specific treatments are detailed in the provided text.
The user is experiencing irritation from using PG with RU58841 and is seeking alternative solutions like K&B in the UK. They report redness, itchiness, and flaky skin from the current treatment.
The conversation discusses using 2% Pyrilutamide from Anagenica for hair loss, as the user did not see results with 1% Pyrilutamide. The user is considering increasing the dosage but is concerned about the cost.
People who had posted about using pyrilutamide for hair loss, but did not return with an update; the potential side effects of pyrilutamide, RU58841 and other treatments such as minoxidil and finasteride were discussed.
The conversation discusses the effectiveness of RU58841 for hair loss compared to pyrilutamide, which failed to show significant hair regrowth in trials. Some users report personal side effects with RU58841 and question the criteria for success in hair loss treatments.
The conversation discusses using RU58841 or Pyrilutamide for hair loss, with some users suggesting switching to more proven treatments like oral or topical finasteride. One user reports no progress with RU58841, finasteride, and minoxidil, and mentions experiencing regression.
The conversation is about the stability of pyrilutamide in different solutions. The user is asking if a 70/30 ethanol/pg solution with 4% water will degrade pyrilutamide.
Pyrilutamide, a potentially effective hair loss treatment; other topical treatments like RU58841 and CB-03-01 that may have fewer side effects than Pyrilutamide; and the Phase 3 clinical trials of Pyrilutamide, which is likely to be approved by the FDA soon.
The user experienced significant hair regrowth using a combination of minoxidil, alfatradiol, pyrilutamide, and nizoral, despite previous intolerance to finasteride. They emphasize the importance of consistency in treatment and are optimistic about the results, noting no side effects so far.