Search
for

    Sort by

    Community Join

    330-360 / 1000+ results

      community Brutal... RU58841 , is that true ?

      in Update  162 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841. Concerns are raised about the lack of studies on RU58841 and its potential effects.

      community Complete non responder to everything. Modern Norwood Sisyphus

      in Update  76 upvotes 9 months ago
      The user has been using finasteride for four years and topical minoxidil with microneedling for a year but has not seen significant results in slowing hair loss. They are considering trying dutasteride despite concerns about its intensity, and others suggest trying oral minoxidil or combining treatments for better results.

      community P-1075: a BETTER version of Minoxidil

      in Research/Science 5 months ago
      P-1075 is a more potent hair growth agent than Minoxidil, but it poses significant heart risks, making it unsafe for use. Despite promising results in macaques, concerns about its cardiotoxicity in rats have halted its development.

      community RU-58841 without finassteride?

      in Treatment  6 upvotes 9 months ago
      RU58841 is used without finasteride by some due to side effects, with mixed results. Users report combining RU58841 with minoxidil and adjusting finasteride doses to manage hair loss.

      community RU55841 premixed solution vs powder

      in Treatment  5 upvotes 4 years ago
      RU58841 treatment for hair loss, comparing premixed solutions to powder form. Users prefer powder for cost-effectiveness and customization.

      community Creatine and ru-58841 experiences?

      in Chat  1 upvotes 6 months ago
      RU58841 is preferred over finasteride for blocking DHT on the scalp, especially for those with aggressive MPB. Creatine is associated with increased hair shedding, even when using RU58841.

      community Has anyone tried this Ru58841 from Amazon ?

      in Product  3 upvotes 7 months ago
      RU58841 from Amazon is unreliable, with users reporting no benefits and side effects like eye swelling and chest pain. Rudirect is recommended for purchasing in Europe.

      community An *insane* RU58841 success story

      in Progress Pictures  97 upvotes 1 year ago
      RU58841, oral and topical minoxidil, finasteride, and ketoconazole shampoo led to significant hair regrowth, though some suspect a hair transplant. Concerns about RU58841's side effects, like anxiety and heart issues, were discussed.

      community PTD-DBM Update: Q&A With Dr. Kang-Yell Choi

      in Treatment  14 upvotes 6 years ago
      PTD-DBM is being explored for hair regrowth by targeting CXXC5, with clinical trials expected after pre-clinical studies. Users express anticipation and skepticism about its effectiveness.

      community Why are there no proper phase 3 trials for RU

      in Chat  4 upvotes 3 weeks ago
      RU58841 lacks FDA approval due to financial and safety concerns, including potential cardiological side effects. The company abandoned further research, and users report adverse effects like heart palpitations and gynecomastia.

      community I am doing an experience with RU58841

      in Treatment 6 months ago
      The conversation discusses a user experimenting with RU58841 for hair regrowth by ingesting it, which others find concerning. There are mentions of potential side effects and comparisons to other treatments like minoxidil, finasteride, and flutamide.

      community Ru-58841 vs KX-826/pyrilutamide while on steroids

      in Finasteride/Dutasteride  5 upvotes 1 year ago
      The user increased their steroid dosage and noticed hair shedding, so they adjusted their regimen by reducing steroid doses and adding oral dutasteride. They are also experimenting with combining RU-58841 and KX-826/pyrilutamide in minoxidil to address hair loss.

      community It's probably RU58841, which is weak in adenosine.

      in Treatment  14 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation is about using adenosine, finasteride, and minoxidil for hair loss treatment. The user ordered a 0.75% adenosine solution and is currently using finasteride 1mg and minoxidil 5%.

      community RU-58441 Janoshik test result of Made-In-China Supplier

      in Product  30 upvotes 4 months ago
      A user ordered RU58841 from a Chinese supplier, found it to be less than 99% pure, and plans to try a different seller next time. Concerns were raised about impurities, but the user believes they are likely inactive fillers rather than harmful substances.

      community Realistic expectations for my treatment

      in General  1 upvotes 11 months ago
      The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841. The focus is on setting realistic expectations for these treatments.

      community Bad news about GT20029 from Anagen Inc

      in Treatment  12 upvotes 3 years ago
      The conversation is about the difficulty in obtaining GT20029, a hair loss treatment, due to patent issues and the need to resort to group buys or Chinese labs for acquisition. Specific treatments mentioned include Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841.

      community Found a winning combo for a non/weak-responder

      in Research/Science  4 upvotes 1 year ago
      A user found a successful hair loss treatment using a combination of finasteride, dutasteride, minoxidil, and RU58841. They plan to switch to a purely topical regimen with finasteride, RU58841, and minoxidil.

      community Reverse Tressless...LOL O_O O_O

      in Satire  130 upvotes 8 months ago
      A person with a full head of hair chose to laser it off, sparking disbelief and discussions about hair loss treatments like Minoxidil and Finasteride. Many users questioned the decision, suggesting it might be a troll post or an extreme reaction to balding concerns.

      community PP405 2a study was a safety study. Some rational explaining.

      in Research/Science  22 upvotes 7 months ago
      The conversation discusses the safety study of PP405, emphasizing that early trials focus on safety rather than efficacy, and that any efficacy data from such a short study should be viewed skeptically. It also highlights that the information released is primarily for securing funding, and that meaningful efficacy results are expected in later phases.