Search

everythinglearnresearchcommunity

for

Search:↓

12 companies having drugs or therapies in clinical trials during 2023, with various molecules and phases of trial; the probability that some may fail; and progress being made in the field.

The conversation is about when GT20029, a hair loss treatment, might be available on the grey market, with users discussing the challenges of compounding it and speculating it might be available after phase 2 results, similar to pyri. Specific treatments mentioned are pyri, RU58841, and GT20029.

The safety and effectiveness of RU-58841 as a hair loss treatment, with some users reporting side effects like chest pains, while others had positive results. The original research on RU-58841 was likely stopped due to financial issues, not safety concerns.

RU58841 has significantly improved the user's hair loss experience, alongside oral finasteride, dutasteride, 5 mg minoxidil, topical finasteride, dermastamping, and low-level laser therapy. The user is considering increasing their RU58841 dose from 75 mg to 100-150 mg daily.

The conversation discusses using NAC and quercetin as supplements for hair loss, with some users also mentioning finasteride. NAC is highlighted for its potential benefits, but concerns about its safety and absorption are also raised.

Minoxidil and finasteride are discussed for hair loss, with concerns about minoxidil's heart-related side effects. New treatments like PP405 are met with skepticism, often humorously noted as always being "five years away."

Researching the release of phase 2 trials for pyrilutamide, a potential hair loss treatment, and discussing other treatments such as Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841.

The conversation discusses the safety and effectiveness of continuing or adding RU58841 after stopping finasteride for hair loss treatment. One user expresses skepticism about using RU58841 due to the lack of full human trials.

New hair loss treatments like GT20029 and PP405 could potentially replace minoxidil and finasteride, offering better results with fewer side effects. However, current treatments like finasteride and minoxidil are still effective for many, despite concerns about side effects.

Belgium disagrees with the EMA and does not authorize the 1 mg oral form of finasteride for androgenic alopecia, citing a negative benefit-risk ratio. Despite this, some individuals in Belgium can still obtain finasteride through prescriptions, and there is debate over its mental health risks versus its benefits for hair loss and other health issues.

PP405's phase 2a trial results were presented, focusing on safety and pharmacokinetics, with a future meeting planned to share the full dataset. The trial includes a randomized controlled portion and an open-label extension, with no indication of phase 2B completion.

The conversation provides scientific sources on hair loss treatments like finasteride, minoxidil, and others, aiming to help individuals make informed decisions about their treatment options. It also discusses phytochemicals as alternative treatments due to concerns about side effects from drug-based therapies.

A 23-year-old with hair loss uses finasteride, minoxidil, and other treatments, considering adding dutasteride due to hairline recession. They seek advice on dutasteride's effectiveness and sourcing.

A potential new treatment for hair loss, Pyrilutamide, and the discussion of whether or not people should still be taking traditional treatments like Minoxidil and Finasteride with it.

The user is seeking advice on adding CB 03-01 to their hair loss treatment, which includes RU58841, Fluridil, Minoxidil, and Pantostin, but cannot use finasteride.

Reducing the dose of RU58841 from 25mg to 7.5mg topically helped minimize heart palpitations. Users discussed the cardiac effects of RU58841 and minoxidil, noting that no treatment is completely free of side effects.

Exploring hair loss treatments beyond DHT, including Minoxidil, pyruvate, Gt20029 targeting androgen receptors, and vasodilators. Other options like Kx826, adenosine signaling, growth factor topicals, and microneedling are also discussed.

The conversation is about comparing the effectiveness of fluridil and clascoterone in preventing hair loss and inquiring about their use as standalone treatments. There is a question about the concentration of the fluridil brand for efficacy.

People are discussing the potential benefits and drawbacks of a new time-release oral minoxidil (VDPHL01) for hair loss, with considerations about its cost, efficacy, and side effects compared to current treatments like 2.5mg doses and topical applications. Some users express interest in trying it if it proves effective and affordable, while others are cautious due to potential side effects or are satisfied with their current regimen.

The conversation discusses using RU58841, a research chemical, for hair loss treatment. The user plans to use it due to side effects from finasteride and minoxidil, despite skepticism about its effectiveness and lack of FDA approval.

The user is considering switching from Hims to generic minoxidil and finasteride, with slightly lower dosages. They are concerned about maintaining their current hair condition without regrowth.

SCUBE3 is available online but poses risks like tumor promotion and high costs. Users advise against using it due to health concerns and inefficacy as a standalone treatment.

A 33-year-old is considering using Minoxidil and Dutasteride for hair loss but is hesitant due to concerns about long-term commitment and side effects. They are advised to consider starting with topical treatments to assess their response.

PP405 is seen as promising but uncertain, with users advised to continue using existing treatments like minoxidil and finasteride. Concerns include its cost, availability, and interaction with hair transplants, while some hope it could complement current treatments.

The conversation discusses skepticism about group buys for hair loss treatments, highlighting issues with unverified chemicals and the risks involved. It suggests stabilizing with dutasteride and minoxidil, and considering a hair transplant instead of experimenting with untested products.

The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841. The focus is on setting realistic expectations for these treatments.

A 31-year-old man has been using Dutasteride since 2022, alongside topical Minoxidil, with positive results and no issues. His new healthcare provider expressed concerns about long-term Dutasteride use and suggested alternatives like oral Minoxidil and Spironolactone, but the patient is hesitant to change a successful routine.

The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically Breezula, Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841. Participants express curiosity about Breezula's safety and its steroidal nature.

A 16-year-old is considering using 5% topical minoxidil for hair loss at the temples and crown but is concerned about potential issues from not using finasteride due to age restrictions. They plan to start minoxidil now and consider adding finasteride at 18 if available.

A 26-year-old is considering switching from a finasteride and minoxidil blend to using dutasteride and minoxidil separately, with concerns about shedding and dosage changes. They are exploring options for sourcing and considering using ketoconazole shampoo to manage dryness.