Search
for

    Sort by

    Community Join

    990-1000 / 1000+ results

      community day 107 of kx826 .5% . 1+ years on topical minoxidil.

      in Progress Pictures  18 upvotes 1 year ago
      The user has been using topical minoxidil for over a year and added kx826/pyrilutamide to improve hair growth, avoiding finasteride due to side effects like lowered libido and panic attacks. They report positive results with reduced shedding and healthier hair, particularly in areas previously unresponsive to minoxidil.

      community Topical minoxidil responder tests + switching to oral

      in Minoxidil  1 upvotes 5 months ago
      The user has been using topical minoxidil with tretinoin for 9 months without much regrowth and suspects finasteride is responsible for any improvement. They are inquiring about tests to determine response to topical minoxidil and seeking advice on switching to oral minoxidil, including potential side effects and monitoring requirements.

      community Pyrilutamide vs Ru58841 thoughts

      in Research/Science  8 upvotes 3 years ago
      The user has been using Pyrilutamide (Pyril) for hair loss for a month alongside finasteride/dutasteride since 2021 but hasn't seen results. They are considering switching to RU58841 due to its many success stories, despite being skeptical about the legitimacy and testing of Pyrilutamide.

      community 18M , on minox 5% for 1.5 months, is this regrowth??

      in Is this regrowth?  8 upvotes 6 months ago
      An 18-year-old is using topical minoxidil 5% and derma rolling weekly for hair regrowth after shaving their head, while also addressing vitamin D deficiency and thyroid imbalance. They are questioning if the changes observed are signs of regrowth.

      community 2021 vs 2024. Consistency is key.

      in Progress Pictures  1910 upvotes 1 year ago
      The user shared progress pictures showing significant hair regrowth from using finasteride, RU58841, and liquid minoxidil, emphasizing the importance of consistency. They noted that RU58841, a research chemical not FDA-approved, was effective when applied topically but warned of potential heart-related side effects.