Search

everythinglearnresearchcommunity

for

Search:↓

RU-58642 is a powerful anti-androgen that was not developed further, possibly due to safety concerns or financial reasons. RU58841 is a topical alternative, but it is less effective than finasteride and dutasteride, and its long-term effects are not well-studied.

The user is experiencing hair regrowth after using spironolactone, minoxidil 5%, and various supplements. They plan to purchase men's minoxidil for cost efficiency and use Nizoral shampoo and an oil blend for hair care.

A user created a tracker for hair loss treatments in clinical development, including compounds like Dermaliq, RU58841, and Pyrilutamide. The tracker updates with new information and allows filtering by conditions like androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and alopecia areata (AA).

The conversation is about hair loss treatments, specifically the anticipation for the release of a new treatment, GT20029, by 2028. Users are discussing their experiences with current treatments like finasteride and dutasteride, and the potential of future treatments, including FAK inhibitors and verteporfin trials.

Hair loss treatments, specifically about the effectiveness of RU58841 compared to Pyrilutamide. Molecular weights and side effects were discussed in terms of efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

The user experienced side effects from various hair loss treatments, including RU58841, finasteride, and dutasteride. They are uncertain about what treatment to try next.

The user shared progress pictures showing significant hair regrowth from using finasteride, RU58841, and liquid minoxidil, emphasizing the importance of consistency. They noted that RU58841, a research chemical not FDA-approved, was effective when applied topically but warned of potential heart-related side effects.

Shiseido's S-DSC hair regenerative treatment in Japan focuses on improving existing hair by thickening miniaturized follicles, not creating new ones. There is limited patient feedback and long-term data available.

A Spanish dermatologist suggests sulforaphane for androgenetic alopecia (AGA) due to its potential to remove DHT metabolites, though high dosages are needed. A topical formulation might be possible.

The user stopped using finasteride and RU58841 and is considering CB-03-01 for androgenic alopecia but is concerned about the cost and effectiveness, especially at a lower dose than in clinical trials. They are also using minoxidil, micro-needling, and nizoral shampoo but are unsure about the correct application method for CB-03-01.

A user is making a 2-Deoxy-D-ribose solution and asks if it can be put into an oil instead of a gel, considering adding hydrocortisone and retinoic acid. They seek advice on the best carrier oil for hair growth.

The user is hesitant to use finasteride due to potential hormonal side effects and is waiting for the release of pyrilutamide, a new hair loss treatment. Other users suggest trying finasteride, warning about potential regret if hair loss progresses in the meantime.

The user is experiencing significant hair shedding after starting RU58841, despite using dutasteride and oral minoxidil for over a year without stabilization. Others suggest continuing the treatment as shedding can be a normal phase, but caution that RU58841 is unpredictable.

PP405 shows promise for hair regrowth by manipulating stem cell characteristics and lactate dehydrogenase, with Phase 2a trials pending. Google Ventures' $15M investment suggests confidence, but results and market availability remain uncertain.

The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically mentioning Spiro, Min, Fin, and RU. It highlights that Spiro is generally for women and can affect men's hormonal balance.

Comparing the effectiveness of RU58841, Pyrilutamide and CB-03-01 as treatments for hair loss, with people discussing different aspects such as binding affinity, time of inhibition, safety data and cost.

The conversation discusses using RU58841, Minoxidil, and finasteride for hair loss treatment. It focuses on homebrewing RU58841 while using other treatments.

RU58841 cured seborrheic dermatitis, oily scalp, dandruff, and scalp pain, improving hair health when combined with Minoxidil. Another user noted diet impacts their seborrheic dermatitis and that finasteride hasn't changed their condition.

PRP is not a cure for baldness but can support hair growth, though it requires ongoing sessions and is costly. Minoxidil and Finasteride are commonly used treatments, but results vary.

Actifolic's RU58841 and Pyri products are perceived as ineffective, with users reporting no side effects or improvements, suggesting possible quality issues. Users recommend alternative sources and emphasize the importance of timing when using RU58841 with Minoxidil.

The user has been using finasteride and minoxidil for hair loss but experienced worsening temple recession. They suspect they might be more sensitive to testosterone and are considering trying RU58841 or CB 03 01 as additional treatments.

The conversation discusses the use of ethanol and propylene glycol (PG) in topical solutions for hair loss treatments, specifically Minoxidil. The user dislikes the texture of PG and questions the ideal ratio and necessity of PG in these solutions.

The conversation is about using RU58841 for hair loss, discussing the stability of the powder form and the need for a carrier solution like KB or PG + ethanol. The user is advised to mix RU58841 with stemoxydine and store it properly, while also considering safety precautions.

RU58841, a hair loss treatment, is available on Amazon, but its legitimacy is questioned due to sketchy reviews and lack of lab reports. Some users report seeing results, while others experience negative side effects.

The user experienced rapid hair thinning on top of the head after two GFC treatments, despite using topical minoxidil for four years. Hair on the sides and back became thicker, leading to confusion and questioning of the treatment decision.

The conversation is about the potential benefits of Rapamycin for hair pigmentation and regeneration, based on effects observed in mice. The original poster is seeking personal experiences from others using Rapamycin for longevity.

A 42-year-old man started using RU-58841 for hair loss and saw noticeable results after a month and a half, even his daughter observed hair growth. He did not use minoxidil or finasteride due to cost and is considering sharing pictures if improvement continues.

RU58841 is generally considered ineffective as a standalone hair loss treatment, with most users combining it with finasteride or dutasteride for better results. Few report success using RU58841 alone.

GT20029 and PP405 are discussed as potential alternatives or complements to finasteride for hair loss treatment. GT20029 is entering phase 3 trials, while PP405 is seen as promising for regrowing hair and possibly eliminating the need for other treatments.

The user shared progress on hair regrowth using a topical minoxidil/finasteride spray, dermarolling weekly, and a product similar to pp405. They reported some regrowth with no side effects from the new product.