A user who was losing their hair and found an effective solution; they asked for opinions on it and discussed treatments such as Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841, as well as SMP.
The conversation discusses skepticism about a user's hair restoration progress, with accusations of the post being fake and promoting an AI app. Treatments mentioned include dutasteride and oral minoxidil, with some users discussing side effects and safety of minoxidil.
The conversation is about buying an authentic Dr. Pen for microneedling in Belgium and where to purchase related supplies like 70% isopropyl alcohol, denture tablets, antiseptic cleanser, and hyaluronic acid. The user is unsure about the official site and seeks recommendations.
RU58841, an anti-androgenic compound, showed early promise for treating alopecia but faced challenges after its patent in 1997. Despite advancing to Phase II trials, safety concerns and financial struggles led Aventis to abandon its development. Proskelia, which later merged into ProStrakan, couldn't prioritize the drug, leading to its eventual stagnation and failure to reach the market.
Hmi115, a prolactin receptor blocker, showed promise for hair growth, but results from Phase 2 trials have not been published. ABS-201, an AI-based analog, is expected to begin trials in December 2025, while commercialization of treatments like PP-405 is anticipated around 2027.
A satirical post humorously discusses a fictional hair regrowth drug called PP405, with users joking about its effectiveness and bizarre presentation. The conversation includes humorous reactions and references to the absurdity of the content.
The user is considering switching from a stamp to a pen for hair treatment due to poor results with the stamp. They are concerned about the availability of pen refills and are seeking better outcomes with the pen.
FCE 28260 (PNU 156765), an under-explored 5α-reductase inhibitor, showcases promising results in research by Giudici et al., outperforming well-known treatments like Finasteride in reducing the conversion of testosterone to DHT. Its superior efficacy, demonstrated through lower IC50 values in both natural and human recombinant enzyme studies, suggests it could offer more effective management of DHT-related conditions. Additionally, its lower molecular weight hints at better potential for topical application, potentially offering advantages in treating conditions such as androgenic alopecia. Despite its potential, it has not advanced in development, possibly due to financial limitations, leaving its therapeutic prospects and side effect profile largely unexplored.
RU58841 is used without finasteride by some due to side effects, with mixed results. Users report combining RU58841 with minoxidil and adjusting finasteride doses to manage hair loss.
User celebrates 2-year anniversary of 2500 FUE hair transplant procedure and worries about future hair loss. Others compliment the results and suggest using Dut and Min to maintain hair.
A user is considering whether to continue using RU58841 or switch to hair system patches for a receding hairline, while already using finasteride, oral minoxidil, and microneedling. Another user suggests buying RU58841 in powder form to save money and notes the original poster's hair has significantly improved.
Finasteride and Dutasteride used in combination with RU58841 and microneedling, as a treatment for hair loss. There was discussion on progress of the treatment and potential other methods to consider.
Kintor is producing a cosmetic with KX826, starting at 0.5% concentration and moving to 1%. The 0.5% concentration wasn't as effective as minoxidil and finasteride, but the 1% concentration shows promise.
User discusses trying Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for hair loss and its high cost. Another user shares their experience combining micro needling, minoxidil, and LLLT, seeing positive results after 2 months.
The conversation discusses whether RU58841, if FDA approved and safe, would be recommended over finasteride for hair loss. Specific treatments mentioned include RU58841, finasteride, and minoxidil.
Considering adding Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) to a hair loss prevention regimen; discussing the effectiveness of LLLT, and evaluating double-blind random-controlled trials that have been conducted on laser combs.
The user has been using Pyrilutamide (Pyril) for hair loss for a month alongside finasteride/dutasteride since 2021 but hasn't seen results. They are considering switching to RU58841 due to its many success stories, despite being skeptical about the legitimacy and testing of Pyrilutamide.
A user is seeking advice on purchasing RU58841 with Minoxidil in Canada and is concerned about the vehicle used for the solution. They also inquire about the differences between RU58841 and topical finasteride in terms of efficacy.
An experiment to determine the effectiveness of Pyrilutamide in reducing hair loss, using a regimen of Minoxidil and Finasteride, with promising results. The conversation also suggests comparing this to RU58841 as an alternative.
The user experienced side effects from daily 1 mg Finasteride and switched to 0.5 mg every other day, supplemented with creatine, tongkat ali, tribulus terrestris, vitamin D3, bromantane, l-tyrosine, and caffeine. They also use weekly 1.5 mm microneedling and daily 50 mg RU58841, except on microneedling days, to manage hair loss.
Pyrilutamide is discussed as a potential hair loss treatment, acting as an androgen receptor antagonist. The conversation questions if it can maintain hair long-term without using finasteride.
People are not using RU58841 for hair loss because it's not FDA approved, lacks long-term safety data, and is difficult to obtain and verify. They prefer FDA-approved treatments like minoxidil, finasteride, ketoconazole shampoo, and microneedling.
Switching from Arimidex to Raloxifene worsened hair loss despite using Dutasteride. The user added oral Minoxidil, dermastamping, and RU58841 to their regimen to address the issue.
The conversation discusses arranging an interview with the developers of RU58841 to clarify its safety and reasons for halted research, with some users expressing concerns about potential risks and others citing financial reasons for the discontinuation of studies. Specific treatments mentioned include RU58841, minoxidil, and finasteride.
RU58841 is a controversial hair loss treatment with mixed reviews; some users report success, often in combination with other treatments like finasteride or minoxidil, while others experience side effects like chest pain. The treatment's discontinuation is speculated to be due to patent expiration and lack of profitability, despite some users continuing to use it as part of a broader regimen.
Hair restoration after FUE surgery, with discussions on using finasteride, dutasteride, and oral minoxidil for hair maintenance and growth. Users share experiences with these treatments, noting varying side effects and effectiveness.
The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically Regenera stem cells and exosomes from 'Cellgenic' umbilical cord donors. The user has been using topical minoxidil 5% and 0.001% estradiol for a year without seeing effects, and another user mentions the importance of microneedling.
Actifolic's RU58841 and Pyri products are perceived as ineffective, with users reporting no side effects or improvements, suggesting possible quality issues. Users recommend alternative sources and emphasize the importance of timing when using RU58841 with Minoxidil.