Search
for

    Sort by

    Community Join

    90-120 / 1000+ results

      community RU58841 carrier - PG/Ethanol vs KB solution?

      in Treatment  2 upvotes 4 years ago
      The conversation discusses the differences between PG/Ethanol and KB solutions for RU58841 application, focusing on potential scalp irritation. KB solution is suggested for those allergic to PG, though both contain ethanol which can dry the scalp.

      community Ru58841 long term users efficacy

      in Research/Science  10 upvotes 1 month ago
      RU58841 is effective for long-term hair loss treatment, often used with finasteride or dutasteride for better results. Users report varying experiences with side effects and effectiveness, with some noting improvements and others experiencing shedding or needing to adjust dosages.

      community RU58841 is now on Amazon. Is this legit?

      in Product  14 upvotes 2 years ago
      RU58841, a hair loss treatment, is available on Amazon, but its legitimacy is questioned due to sketchy reviews and lack of lab reports. Some users report seeing results, while others experience negative side effects.

      community Grey Market GT20029 and Frequency of Application

      in Product  10 upvotes 2 years ago
      The conversation is about the potential release of GT20029 on the grey market and concerns about its safety and authenticity. One user advises waiting for the official release by Kintor.

      community I spoke to the Guy who did the Ru58841 (PSK-3841) research

      in Research/Science  291 upvotes 5 years ago
      The conversation discusses RU58841, a compound for hair loss treatment, which was found to be effective in a 6-month trial but was not pursued due to financial issues or marketability concerns, not safety. Some users are considering crowdfunding to release the research data, while others discuss personal experiences and safety concerns with RU58841.

      community Is RU58841 worth it? Has anybody seen success on it?

      in Technology  6 upvotes 3 months ago
      RU58841 is used by some for hair loss, with mixed results; one user reported success with no side effects, while another experienced lung and heart issues. RU58841 is often sourced from third-party vendors and used alongside treatments like dutasteride and minoxidil.

      community How has your experience been with RU58841?

      in Treatment  4 upvotes 2 months ago
      RU58841 is used for hair loss, with some users reporting decreased shedding and preserved hairlines. Concerns about safety and side effects like heart issues are noted, and some combine it with finasteride and minoxidil for better results.

      community RU58841 in Canada, which vehicle is better?

      in Product  5 upvotes 4 years ago
      A user is seeking advice on purchasing RU58841 with Minoxidil in Canada and is concerned about the vehicle used for the solution. They also inquire about the differences between RU58841 and topical finasteride in terms of efficacy.

      community RU58841 in germany eventually facing legal charges

      in Hair Systems  32 upvotes 11 months ago
      The conversation discusses the use of RU58841 for hair loss, with concerns about its legality in Germany and potential legal consequences. Alternatives like finasteride and dutasteride are mentioned, with some users questioning the effectiveness and safety of RU58841.

      community Ru58841 ruined my life. Here’s why.

      in Product  130 upvotes 4 years ago
      User experienced shortness of breath, high blood pressure, red eyes, and eye floaters after using RU58841 for hair loss. They warn others to avoid RU58841 and stick to finasteride, minoxidil, and dutasteride.

      community started RU58841 today and am panicing

      in Treatment  8 upvotes 2 years ago
      A user started using RU58841 for hair loss and experienced anxiety and physical discomfort. Other users suggested avoiding the treatment due to similar side effects and recommended alternative treatments like pyri.

      community Lab results from actifolic RU58841

      in Product  39 upvotes 2 years ago
      The post discusses the user's experience with hair loss treatment RU58841, which was tested for quality and found to be 96+% pure. The conversation includes various responses, with some users questioning the safety of the product and others expressing satisfaction with the test results.

      community Anyone who used RU58841 without fin/dut?

      in Product  1 upvotes 1 year ago
      RU58841 was used by some for hair loss, but concerns about side effects like gynecomastia and safety were raised. Alternatives like finasteride, minoxidil, pyrilutamide, and alfatradiol were discussed, with some users reporting better experiences with these treatments.

      community RU58481, are side effects exegerated?

      in Treatment  4 upvotes 4 years ago
      RU58841's side effects may be exaggerated due to anxiety, with some users experiencing no issues and others reporting symptoms like chest pain. RU58841, minoxidil, and finasteride are used for hair loss treatment, with varying individual reactions.

      community 52 days since adding RU 25 mg nightly

      in Progress Pictures  19 upvotes 5 months ago
      The user added RU58841 to their finasteride and minoxidil routine, noticing significant improvement in hairline after 52 days. Some users warn about potential side effects of RU58841, while others express curiosity and congratulate the progress.

      community Ru58841 for a female w male pattern baldness

      in General  166 upvotes 1 year ago
      A user is considering using RU58841 for female pattern baldness and is also planning to use Minoxidil. They are hesitant to ask their doctor for spironolactone due to its cosmetic nature and are experiencing significant hair loss possibly due to stress and hormonal issues.

      community Research behind RU-58642? Has anyone heard of this?

      in Research/Science  1 upvotes 1 year ago
      RU-58642 is a powerful anti-androgen that was not developed further, possibly due to safety concerns or financial reasons. RU58841 is a topical alternative, but it is less effective than finasteride and dutasteride, and its long-term effects are not well-studied.

      community RU55841 premixed solution vs powder

      in Treatment  4 upvotes 5 years ago
      RU58841 treatment for hair loss, comparing premixed solutions to powder form. Users prefer powder for cost-effectiveness and customization.

      community Chinese source for pyrilutamide or ru8841 ?

      in Product  3 upvotes 8 months ago
      The conversation is about finding a reliable Chinese source for pyrilutamide or RU58841, ideally with a third-party Certificate of Analysis from Janoshik Analytical. The user is seeking recommendations for these hair loss treatments.

      community Anyone ever get a shedding phase on RU58441

      in Chat  6 upvotes 1 year ago
      The user experienced increased hair shedding after using RU58841 for two months, but found relief from scalp itchiness. Other users shared similar shedding experiences and discussed side effects like joint pain, while also mentioning the use of finasteride and minoxidil.

      community who in here has used ru58841 , and how did it go

      in Treatment  8 upvotes 5 months ago
      RU58841 had mixed results for hair regrowth, with some users experiencing no change and others noting regrowth but also side effects like libido issues and chest pain. Some users combined it with other treatments like finasteride and dutasteride, with varying effectiveness.

      community Methods Of Staying Safe On Ru58841 - My 2 Cents

      in Research/Science  21 upvotes 1 year ago
      RU58841 is used topically to prevent hair loss by blocking DHT, with suggestions to drink grapefruit juice, take breaks, avoid microneedling, and use lower concentrations to reduce side effects. Users discuss applying it at night to minimize systemic absorption.

      community The story of RU58841/PSK3841

      in Research/Science 1 year ago
      RU58841, an anti-androgenic compound, showed early promise for treating alopecia but faced challenges after its patent in 1997. Despite advancing to Phase II trials, safety concerns and financial struggles led Aventis to abandon its development. Proskelia, which later merged into ProStrakan, couldn't prioritize the drug, leading to its eventual stagnation and failure to reach the market.