Search
for

    Sort by

    Community Join

    30-60 / 1000+ results

      community Is it safe to use the Dropper from Rudirect with receptorchem ru?

      in Product  1 upvotes 1 year ago
      The user is asking if it's safe to use a glass dropper from a finished RU58841 product with a new RU58841 product and if cleaning it with water is sufficient. They are concerned about the quality of the plastic dropper that came with the new product.

      community CB-03-01 supposed hair loss cure

      in Treatment  9 upvotes 5 years ago
      The conversation discusses why CB-03-01, a potential hair loss treatment, isn't widely discussed despite evidence of its effectiveness and safety. Some users mention other treatments like melatonin, procianidin b2, and RU58841, debating their effectiveness and safety.

      community rudirect ru58841 seems bunk to me

      in Treatment  6 upvotes 1 month ago
      RU58841 from rudirect caused more hair shedding and itch, while anageninc's RU58841 improved the situation. Users are concerned about the quality and authenticity of RU58841 from different suppliers, including those from China.

      community Has anyone tried this Ru58841 from Amazon ?

      in Product  3 upvotes 10 months ago
      RU58841 from Amazon is unreliable, with users reporting no benefits and side effects like eye swelling and chest pain. Rudirect is recommended for purchasing in Europe.

      community ru58841 in europe, without getting water in the mail.

      in Product  1 upvotes 3 months ago
      The conversation is about finding a trustworthy and affordable source for RU58841 in Europe, with a comparison between Anagenic and Actifolic. The user seeks experiences from others in the EU to avoid receiving water instead of the product.

      community CB-03-01 / Breezula Personal Results

      in Treatment  17 upvotes 4 months ago
      The user shared their experience with CB-03-01 (Breezula/Clascoterone) for hair loss, noting reduced shedding and improved hair appearance but experiencing significant sleep disturbances and low energy due to HPA axis suppression. They decided to stop using it due to these side effects and are waiting for GT20029 as an alternative.

      community Does anyone here use MVSupplements.con products?

      in Product  1 upvotes 9 months ago
      The conversation discusses concerns about MVSupplements.com products, specifically the Min+Ru spray and GHK Serum, due to discrepancies in ingredient lists and recent poor feedback. Users also mention a price increase and one user reports no issues with the RU powder.

      community Making your own RT1640 in China

      in Research/Science 4 years ago
      RT1640, a combination of cyclosporin A, minoxidil, and RT175, is discussed as a potential treatment for hair regrowth and repigmentation. The unique formulation aims to enhance hair follicle growth and restore hair pigment without the negative side effects of immunosuppressants.

      community CB-03-01 users come forward!

       13 upvotes 6 years ago
      The conversation discusses the potential of a new hair loss drug, CB-03-01, with users sharing their experiences and seeking advice on dosages and application methods. One user mentions using topical finasteride, minoxidil, dermarolling, and a clean diet for hair maintenance but is interested in CB-03-01 due to side effects from finasteride.

      community CB-03-01: I need help

      in Treatment  7 upvotes 5 years ago
      The user stopped using finasteride and RU58841 and is considering CB-03-01 for androgenic alopecia but is concerned about the cost and effectiveness, especially at a lower dose than in clinical trials. They are also using minoxidil, micro-needling, and nizoral shampoo but are unsure about the correct application method for CB-03-01.

      community Having Ru58841 mailed to my house

      in Research/Science  1 upvotes 4 months ago
      RU58841 can be ordered as a powder and compounded at home, but it should be stored at room temperature to avoid crystallization. Pyraulatmide may follow a similar principle.

      community 11 month Progress 17-18yo with RU58841*

      in Progress Pictures  49 upvotes 1 year ago
      The user experienced hair regrowth using a combination of Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841, with Minoxidil used initially and the other treatments added later. The user believes the combination of Finasteride and RU58841 contributed to the regrowth, with RU sourced from MVsupplement.

      community fluridil (topilutamide) vs. cb-03-01 (clascoterone)

      in Research/Science  5 upvotes 2 years ago
      The conversation is about comparing the effectiveness of fluridil and clascoterone in preventing hair loss and inquiring about their use as standalone treatments. There is a question about the concentration of the fluridil brand for efficacy.

      community Black market pp405? Title title

      in Treatment  8 upvotes 5 months ago
      PP405 is likely fake, and JXL069 is an unrefined prototype with unknown side effects. It's advised to wait for the official PP405 release.

      community Hy-tissue PRP 50 Experience ??

      in Product  4 upvotes 1 year ago
      PRP treatments have been effective for the user, with a new recommendation of using a high-quality plasma kit once a year. The user seeks experiences with this specific PRP approach.

      community Extreme caution: my experience using Ru58841 only once

      in Treatment  10 upvotes 1 year ago
      An 18-year-old experienced severe side effects, including heart palpitations and high blood pressure, after using RU58841 once, leading to a referral to cardiology for suspected left ventricular hypertrophy. The user regrets using RU58841 and seeks advice on recovery, while others suggest preexisting conditions or genetic predispositions may be factors.

      community Veradermics VDPHL01 Topline Results for Extended-Release Oral Minoxidil

      in Minoxidil  71 upvotes 2 months ago
      Extended-release oral minoxidil (VDPHL01) shows promising results for hair growth with improved safety, achieving significant hair count increases and minimal side effects compared to placebo. The treatment is designed to maintain effective concentrations while reducing side effects, making it a safer option for those who cannot tolerate standard minoxidil.

      community The story of RU58841/PSK3841

      in Research/Science 1 year ago
      RU58841, an anti-androgenic compound, showed early promise for treating alopecia but faced challenges after its patent in 1997. Despite advancing to Phase II trials, safety concerns and financial struggles led Aventis to abandon its development. Proskelia, which later merged into ProStrakan, couldn't prioritize the drug, leading to its eventual stagnation and failure to reach the market.

      community Best Sources for High Purity Ru58841

      in Product  2 upvotes 8 months ago
      The conversation is about finding high-purity RU58841 solutions for hair loss treatment, with mentions of Anagenic, Selleckchem, MV Supplement, and rudirect.co.uk as potential sources. Users discuss their experiences and preferences regarding product quality and shipping.

      community Wrap it up everyone. CB-03-01 is another failed treatment

      in Treatment  80 upvotes 9 months ago
      CB-03-01 is considered a failed treatment for hair loss, with future hopes pinned on PP-405 and GT-20029, expected by 2030. Alternatives like hair transplants and SMP are discussed, while some users express frustration over the slow progress of treatments like Breezula.

      community is this the correct version of RU?

      in Product  11 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation discusses the effectiveness and authenticity of RU58841 purchased from Amazon, with some users suggesting buying from reputable sources like Anagen Inc. Others recommend using oral finasteride instead of RU58841 due to concerns about product legitimacy.

      community It’s really unfortunate the CB-03-01 is so expensive.

       13 upvotes 8 years ago
      The conversation discusses the high cost of CB-03-01, a topical antiandrogen for hair loss, which is considered safe and remains localized upon application. It questions whether the expense is justified compared to the lower risks it poses relative to finasteride.