Hair loss treatments, specifically Pyrilutamide and Minoxidil/Finasteride/RU58841. Participants discussed their experiences with them and the results they have seen so far.
The conversation is about finding a reasonably priced shampoo with piroctone olamine in the US. The user is cautious about trying new or smaller brands.
A 20-year-old in Italy struggled to get a finasteride prescription from multiple dermatologists due to concerns about side effects and age, despite using minoxidil. Eventually, they obtained a prescription from a hair transplant surgeon.
The user has been using oral finasteride for 15 years and is considering switching to a finasteride/minoxidil spray due to concerns about potential side effects like depression. They are seeking advice on whether to continue with both treatments or switch exclusively to the spray.
Finasteride and Propecia are essentially the same, but some people may respond differently due to inactive ingredients. If cost is not an issue, Propecia is preferred due to better quality control and consistent results.
The conversation is about finding alfatradiol in the US for hair loss treatment. Specific treatments mentioned are Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841.
The conversation discusses hair loss treatment progress using finasteride for 5 months and a topical solution with 0.1% minoxidil and 7% RU58841 for 11 months, with plans to switch to a stronger topical solution with 0.25% minoxidil, 7% RU58841, and tretinoin. Opinions on improvement are mixed.
The user tried a home-brew topical finasteride regimen for 120 days with initial benefits but no long-term improvement, leading to continued hair shedding. They switched to oral finasteride, experiencing mild testicle discomfort but no changes in libido or erections, and plan to continue this regimen for 120 days.
The conversation discusses disappointment in Verteporfin for hair loss treatment, with a mention of an upcoming trial by Dr. Bisanga. No specific treatments were confirmed as used by the original poster.
The conversation discusses concerns about Dr. Rassman's topical Finasteride, specifically whether it is liposomal or glycol-based. Dr. Rassman insists on providing the correct liposomal formulation and urges patients to contact him if they receive the wrong product.
The user experienced good hair regrowth over three months using a daily topical spray of 0.3% finasteride and 6% minoxidil on the hairline, with no significant side effects. The brand used was Hims.
Topical finasteride absorption starts almost instantly, but the exact time needed for full absorption is unclear. Users suggest it may not need to stay on all day.
User discusses topical liposomal finasteride for hair loss, hoping to avoid breast growth side effect. Conversation includes using minoxidil, fluridil, and dermarolling, and mentions minimal systemic absorption of liposomal finasteride.
Topical finasteride as a potential alternative to oral finasteride for reducing DHT levels on the scalp with fewer side effects, and other hair loss treatments such as minoxidil.
The user reports progress in hair regrowth using topical finasteride/minoxidil, microneedling, topical dutasteride, latanoprost, and MSM supplements. They express frustration over the lack of interaction on progress posts compared to trivial topics.
User experienced significant hair improvement after 9 months using topical fin/min spray. Noticed positive changes around 3-month mark and chose topical treatment due to fewer side effects.
Amplifica has not provided updates on SCUBE3 and AMP-303, raising concerns about their trial outcomes. Users also mention other treatments like Minoxidil, finasteride, RU58841, PP405, and ET-03.
Hair loss treatments discussed include Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841. A user asks about alfatradiol's availability, public perception, and usage in Germany.
After gyno surgery, OP is considering restarting finasteride at a lower dose (0.25mg/0.5mg) or switching to topical to reduce the risk of gyno recurrence. Lower doses and topical application may lessen side effects due to reduced systemic absorption.
A recent publication suggests that the flavonoids eriocitrin and silymarin may be more effective than finasteride in binding to the enzyme responsible for hair loss. People in the conversation are skeptical about the effectiveness and safety of these flavonoids until tested on humans, and some discuss their personal experiences with other treatments.
The user is using finasteride for hair loss and is frustrated with shedding but plans to add oral minoxidil for convenience and safety. There are concerns about using topical minoxidil around pets.
The conversation is about the difficulty of applying both pyril and min/fin to treat hair loss twice daily and whether combining them yields positive results.
RU58841 is not FDA approved, and users are discussing its availability and legitimacy in India, with some mentioning brands like Vantanex and Capomil. One user warns about the risk of gyno from RU58841, advising to stop use at the first sign of sensitivity.
Kintor Pharma finished enrolling and dosing participants in a Phase I trial for a hair loss treatment called AR-PROTAC (GT20029). The effectiveness of another drug, pyrilutamide (KX-826), for hair loss will be clearer after a Phase 2 trial expected to complete in January 2023.
Finasteride improved the user's hair texture and growth, with some initial side effects like libido loss that eventually subsided. The user advises considering lifestyle factors alongside treatment and encourages others to start finasteride if hesitant.
The conversation discusses why there are no FDA-approved NSAAs like RU58841 on the market, despite their potential superiority to 5AR inhibitors like finasteride. It explores the effectiveness of treatments like Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841 for hair loss.