Search

everythinglearnresearchcommunity

for

Search:↓

The user is experiencing hair loss after a hair transplant and is considering using fluridil (Eucapil) and possibly alfatradiol as treatments, as they couldn't tolerate finasteride or minoxidil. The manufacturer of Eucapil confirmed they won't produce higher concentrations due to lack of efficacy.

The user is overjoyed with hair regrowth progress using 1 mg finasteride, 2 ml liquid minoxidil, and ketoconazole shampoo. They applied minoxidil to the affected area without consulting a dermatologist and experienced some shedding for a few days.

The conversation discusses the use of pyrrolidinyl diaminopyrmidine oxide (triaminodil) compared to minoxidil for hair loss treatment. The user is considering switching from 5% minoxidil to a product containing 5% triaminodil.

User asks about CB-03-01 for hair loss treatment and mentions using topical Dutasteride, TRT, and considering mixing CB-03-01 with Fluridil. CB-03-01 is sold at a high price, and user considers trying a lower concentration.

The user is considering switching from pyrilutamide to 0.025% topical finasteride due to concerns about effectiveness and past side effects from a scalp elixir. They aim to maintain hair until new treatments like breezula or GT00029 become available.

A human trial involving verteporfin for hair regeneration, with the results showing some regrowth of 1-2 hairs in an area where a follicular unit was extracted. The conversation also suggested that future studies should involve higher doses and more frequent injections.

A user is asking about the effectiveness and dosage of RU58841 for hair loss, comparing it to Minoxidil and discussing its long-term use alongside Finasteride. They plan to use RU58841 and Finasteride for several years before potentially switching to GT20029.

A user tried a Korean hair loss shampoo and treatment set, noting it improved scalp and hair quality but lacked ingredient details. Other users expressed skepticism about its effectiveness, suggesting it might not significantly impact hair loss.

The conversation is about the effectiveness of Stemoxydine for hair loss. The user reports reduced hair shedding after one week but also a more noticeably thinned scalp.

A user's hair loss progress after 4 months of using a topical fin and min mix, with responses from other users about their experience with the same treatments.

The conversation discusses the cost and insurance coverage of a comprehensive hormone and DHT blood panel for hair loss, with a focus on finasteride treatment. The user seeks a cheaper alternative to a $700 panel recommended in a video.

The conversation discusses using RU58841 at a 2% concentration as an alternative due to side effects from finasteride. The user plans to start with a lower concentration and increase if necessary.

A 34 year old female with androgenic alopecia who has tried treatments such as Spironolactone, Desogen, Minoxidil and Finasteride in order to address her hair loss. It also details the experiences of other women taking Spironolactone for Female Pattern Hair Loss (FPHL).

The user has been taking oral Finasteride and topical Essengen 6 Plus for hair loss and is experiencing increased depression. They plan to get bloodwork to check hormone levels and are seeking advice on which tests to include.

A user is considering exosome therapy from Springs Rejuvenation for hair loss after unsuccessful attempts with PRP, adipose injections, and a laser cap. They are intrigued by the therapy's potential and the clinic's guarantee of 30% improved coverage, despite concerns about FDA approval and high-pressure sales tactics.

The conversation is about a person using dutasteride and minoxidil for hair loss, considering adding RU58841 and PP405 for more density. They are seeking advice on using these treatments and exploring other options like GT20029.

Pyrilutamide, a potential hair loss treatment, and how it compares to existing treatments such as Minoxidil, Finasteride and RU58841. Real-world results are being discussed to determine its effectiveness.

Using a microdose of finasteride on the scalp with minoxidil as a carrier may have positive effects with minimal side effects. The user is also considering the effects of sulforaphane or broccoli sprouts on hair loss.

The user, on testosterone replacement therapy, found finasteride and minoxidil ineffective for hair loss. They are trying a new topical gel with dutasteride, tretinoin, and a higher concentration of minoxidil, and plan to document the results.

Doctors are testing verteporfin topically for healing and potential regeneration after transplants. The user is asking how it is formulated for topical use, such as if it's mixed with a carrier gel.

The user is seeking advice on adding CB 03-01 to their hair loss treatment, which includes RU58841, Fluridil, Minoxidil, and Pantostin, but cannot use finasteride.

A user who was losing their hair and found an effective solution; they asked for opinions on it and discussed treatments such as Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841, as well as SMP.

The user used 0.5 mL of 0.5 mg of Pyrilutamide for 60 days for hair loss, but didn't notice any hair growth. They shared their hormone panel results and are seeking advice on next steps.

The user halted hair loss using 0.01% topical liposomal finasteride daily, with no side effects or regrowth, and recently added 5% minoxidil and low-level laser therapy. They recommend this conservative approach for those hesitant about finasteride.

The conversation is about finding ethanol in California for mixing with RU58841 for hair loss treatment. Users suggest alternatives like high-proof alcohol from liquor stores or purchasing lab-grade ethanol online.

The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically mentioning pyrilutamide, minoxidil, and finasteride. The consensus suggests starting treatment early, with finasteride being a preferred option.

A user was prescribed Hair Forte 3%, a weaker version of Minoxidil, by their dermatologist. They are seeking feedback on its effectiveness.

The conversation is about the potential impact of RU58841 on male fertility, specifically regarding sperm concentration, total count, and motility. The user is curious about the likelihood of RU58841 reducing fertility based on its mechanism of action and comparisons to similar substances.

The conversation discusses the delay in the PP405 Phase 2 study results, now expected by the end of 2025, and skepticism about research practices. There is also mention of optimism for Amplifica's AMP303 and a topical treatment in early testing.

The user has been using RU58841 for about 2 months without noticeable results or side effects and is unsure if this duration is sufficient to judge its effectiveness. Other users suggest continuing the treatment for at least 6 months and ensuring the product's authenticity.