Search
for

    Sort by

    Community Join

    150-180 / 1000+ results

      community CB-03-01: I need help

      in Treatment  7 upvotes 5 years ago
      The user stopped using finasteride and RU58841 and is considering CB-03-01 for androgenic alopecia but is concerned about the cost and effectiveness, especially at a lower dose than in clinical trials. They are also using minoxidil, micro-needling, and nizoral shampoo but are unsure about the correct application method for CB-03-01.

      community Does anyone here use MVSupplements.con products?

      in Product  1 upvotes 8 months ago
      The conversation discusses concerns about MVSupplements.com products, specifically the Min+Ru spray and GHK Serum, due to discrepancies in ingredient lists and recent poor feedback. Users also mention a price increase and one user reports no issues with the RU powder.

      community How long do you keep ru-58841 on?

      in Product  1 upvotes 8 months ago
      The conversation discusses the application of RU58841 for hair loss, with the user applying 1.75 mg at 5% concentration for half an hour daily. The user mentions managing seborrheic dermatitis while using this treatment.

      community Upcoming Setipiprant clinical trials hint at systemic daily dosage

       22 upvotes 10 years ago
      The conversation discusses the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oral Setipiprant tablets for treating androgenetic alopecia compared to finasteride. It mentions the high cost of Setipiprant on the black market and the trial's end date in September 2017.

      community Longterm ru58841 users + my experience

      in Treatment  7 upvotes 1 year ago
      RU58841 users report mixed results, with some experiencing no benefits and others noting regrowth but potential side effects. Many prefer finasteride and minoxidil due to better-studied safety profiles.

      community The New, Improved CB-03-01/Setipiprant Group Buy

       27 upvotes 9 years ago
      The group buy for CB-03-01, a topical anti-androgen for hair loss, was postponed and refunded due to issues with the product's form and solubility. The product, also known as Breezula, is an alternative to finasteride with fewer side effects, but its official release is delayed until 2021.

      community Aiming to Standardize RU58841

      in Chat  7 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation discusses the use of RU58841 for hair loss, focusing on its side effects, standardization issues, and user experiences. The user also inquires about the use of other treatments like minoxidil, finasteride, and microneedling.

      community Aesthetic Cosmetics RU8841 real or not? Australia RU

      in Treatment  1 upvotes 2 years ago
      A user switched from Anageninc to Aesthetic Cosmetics for RU58841 and experienced increased shedding, questioning the product's authenticity. They seek advice on reliable sources for RU58841 in Australia.

      community biolabshop RU58841 source legit??

      in Product  1 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation is about using Biolabshop's RU58841 product, which includes GHK-Cu and melatonin, to improve hair quality and combat hair loss. The user has previously used finasteride, minoxidil, and Anageninc’s RU58841 with success and seeks feedback on the new product, especially from those on anabolic steroids or hormone treatments.

      community Continue RU58841 or hair system for receding hair line?

      in Progress Pictures  9 upvotes 2 years ago
      A user is considering whether to continue using RU58841 or switch to hair system patches for a receding hairline, while already using finasteride, oral minoxidil, and microneedling. Another user suggests buying RU58841 in powder form to save money and notes the original poster's hair has significantly improved.

      community RU58841 - Has anyone tried it before?

      in Research/Science  8 upvotes 1 month ago
      RU58841 is discussed as an effective hair loss treatment, with some users experiencing regrowth and reduced shedding, but concerns about safety and sourcing are raised. Users advise against purchasing from Amazon, recommending reputable sources and cautioning about potential side effects like cardiovascular issues.

      community where does the renewed spironolactone hype come from?

      in Research/Science  8 upvotes 3 years ago
      Topical spironolactone is gaining attention as an alternative hair loss treatment, but it's not as effective as other options like finasteride. Oral spironolactone can cause side effects in men, and there are better topical alternatives like RU, Pyril, and CB.

      community medication for hair loss spironolactone

      in Female  3 upvotes 3 years ago
      41-year-old female experienced slow hair thinning, took finasteride for a year, then switched to spironolactone. Irregular periods occurred, seeking advice on long-term side effects and considering a third medication.

      community fluridil (topilutamide) vs. cb-03-01 (clascoterone)

      in Research/Science  5 upvotes 2 years ago
      The conversation is about comparing the effectiveness of fluridil and clascoterone in preventing hair loss and inquiring about their use as standalone treatments. There is a question about the concentration of the fluridil brand for efficacy.

      community Brutal... RU58841 , is that true ?

      in Update  162 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, specifically Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841. Concerns are raised about the lack of studies on RU58841 and its potential effects.

      community Estimate of GT20029 on the grey market?

      in Technology  9 upvotes 2 years ago
      The conversation is about when GT20029, a hair loss treatment, might be available on the grey market, with users discussing the challenges of compounding it and speculating it might be available after phase 2 results, similar to pyri. Specific treatments mentioned are pyri, RU58841, and GT20029.

      community A warning to anyone considering 3rd party sourcing PP405 or its analogs

      in Treatment  31 upvotes 2 months ago
      Be cautious when sourcing PP405 or its analogs from third-party suppliers due to potential safety risks and lack of regulatory approval. The conversation highlights concerns about counterfeit products and the absence of reliable testing, making it risky to use such treatments.