Serevelle is being considered for hair loss due to menopause, but its effectiveness is unclear. Minoxidil and hormone management are suggested alternatives.
The user is considering adding an anti-androgen, RU58841, to their current hair loss treatment routine due to receding hair. They are also contemplating waiting for Breezula or Pyrilutamide to become more affordable.
The conversation discusses a topical finasteride therapy with hydrocortisone butyrate, estrone base, and breviline. A user suggests oral finasteride as a superior option.
A monoclonal antibody clinical trial for potential hair loss treatments in Victoria, Australia and the discussion of their efficacy. People shared information about similar drugs already on the market, speculated about potential side effects, and discussed how to spread the word about the trial.
The conversation is about when GT20029, a hair loss treatment, might be available on the grey market, with users discussing the challenges of compounding it and speculating it might be available after phase 2 results, similar to pyri. Specific treatments mentioned are pyri, RU58841, and GT20029.
Long-term RU58841 users discuss its effectiveness, with some finding it not worth the cost compared to other treatments like Dutasteride and Minoxidil. One user experienced side effects from a chemical company product, while another is regrowing hair after stopping RU58841.
The user shared progress on hair regrowth using oral dutasteride, oral minoxidil, and verteporfin procedures. They reported some regrowth after 6-9 months of treatment.
A man used finasteride, minoxidil, and a derma pen for a year to improve hair growth with no significant side effects. He plans to continue the treatment and explore new options.
A case study that suggests verteporfin may be able to help regrow donor hairs after FUE extraction, and the potential implications of this result. Treatments discussed include Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841.
The conversation is about a user expressing concerns over the safety of a new drug called Pyrilutamide (also known as KX-826) for hair loss. The user will only trust the drug if it's permitted by EU regulations and sold by a reputable company.
The conversation discusses various hair loss treatments, including pyrilutamide, RU58841, topical dutasteride, oral minoxidil, and oral finasteride/dutasteride. It also mentions potential treatments like PP405, Verteporfin, GT20029, and AMP303.
The conversation discusses a user experimenting with RU58841 for hair regrowth by ingesting it, which others find concerning. There are mentions of potential side effects and comparisons to other treatments like minoxidil, finasteride, and flutamide.
New hair loss treatments PP405 and VDPHL01 are discussed with skepticism and hope, alongside existing treatments like minoxidil and finasteride. Users express frustration over limited progress since the 1980s but remain cautiously optimistic.
RU58841 is discussed as a hair loss treatment, with concerns about its effectiveness diminishing after two years due to androgen receptor upregulation. The user is hesitant to start using it, fearing it may worsen their condition over time.
Dr. Kang-Yell Choi's company, CK Regeon, is developing a drug called KY19382 for hair regeneration, which involves creating fine wounds to activate stem cells. The drug is in the formulation development stage, targeting markets like the US and Korea.
The conversation is about hair loss treatments, specifically discussing RU58841, with concerns about its safety and lack of research. Alternatives like finasteride, dutasteride, and minoxidil are mentioned, with some users sharing personal experiences and side effects.
The conversation is about a user interested in participating in hair cloning clinical trials due to their fine hair and previous positive experience with clinical trials. They are seeking information on how to volunteer for such trials.
The user is seeking alternatives to propylene glycol and glycerin for mixing with RU58841 due to allergies and greasiness. Suggestions include reducing glycerin and considering stemoxydine as a solvent.
The user is using 0.1% dutasteride, 1% minoxidil with 2% procapil and 0.005% caffeine in the morning, and 1% minoxidil with 2% procapil and 0.01% tretinoin at night. They are concerned about the solution vehicle's effectiveness in preventing systemic absorption and ensuring the products stay around the hair follicles.
The user started treating their slightly thinning, receded hairline with a serum containing Redensyl and other ingredients, and dermarolling weekly. They recently began taking finasteride and plan to stop Redensyl in the future to test if hair loss resumes.
A user is seeking advice on treating a chin scar with Verteporfin, noting that higher doses were more effective. Another user responds that they do not use it, without providing further explanation.
The user experienced significant hair improvement over two years using finasteride, minoxidil foam, and ketoconazole, despite some initial shedding and a side effect of watery semen. They are satisfied with the results and encourage others to persist with their treatment.
The conversation is about a person's two-year journey combating hair loss. They've used finasteride, dutasteride, RU58841, and Minoxidil as treatments, but are unsure which is most effective.
RU58841 had mixed results for hair regrowth, with some users experiencing no change and others noting regrowth but also side effects like libido issues and chest pain. Some users combined it with other treatments like finasteride and dutasteride, with varying effectiveness.
A user shared their hair regrowth journey from Norwood 7 at age 22 using oral minoxidil 10mg, dutasteride 0.5mg, and RU58841 70mg, along with a recent hair transplant. They experienced significant progress and discussed potential side effects, particularly with oral minoxidil, and plan to update on further growth.
The conversation discusses using estradiol mesotherapy to replicate hormone replacement therapy results while minimizing systemic exposure. It also covers the use of Spironolactone cream, which reportedly has no systemic side effects, and the potential risks of using bicalutamide and Spironolactone in men.