Effectiveness of Single‐Wavelength 755 nm Laser Compared to Dual‐Wavelength 755 nm and 1064 nm Laser in Hair Removal: A Split‐Body Design With Blinding

Considering adding Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) to a hair loss prevention regimen; discussing the effectiveness of LLLT, and evaluating double-blind random-controlled trials that have been conducted on laser combs.

The conversation discusses the effectiveness of commercial Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) devices for hair growth, suggesting they are underpowered compared to the ideal energy output shown in medical research. A user plans to build a custom helmet that meets the required specifications for effective treatment.

The user is asking for opinions on low level laser light therapy for hair growth and thickening. They have been using it for a year but haven't seen significant results, attributing any regrowth to topical minoxidil.

Combining microneedling with Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for hair growth, with discussions on device legitimacy and effectiveness. Alternatives like PEMF and the use of oral and topical treatments such as dutasteride, minoxidil, and finasteride are also considered.

Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for hair loss is effective but requires consistent use and device replacement every 1-2 years. The treatment is costly, and results may not be permanent without continued use.

The user tried LLLT laser treatment for hair loss, noticing less hair shedding and thicker hair after six months, emphasizing consistency and gentle scalp care. Other users questioned the authenticity of the post and inquired about the frequency and type of device used.