Search
for

    Research

    5 / 363 results

    Community Join

    5 / 1000+ results

      community Bee venom better than minoxidil?

      in Research/Science  1061 upvotes 5 months ago
      Bee venom at 0.001% concentration was more effective than 2% minoxidil in promoting hair growth in mice, possibly due to increased growth factors and reduced inflammation. Caution is advised due to potential allergic reactions and the reliance on animal data.

      community Fin 1 mg oral 1x/day + min topical 2x/day, 4 months progress

      in Progress Pictures 3 years ago
      Anxious_Bee_67's 4 month progress with a hair loss treatment regimen of 1 mg oral finasteride once a day and topical minoxidil twice a day, which has brought "hope" to others who are fighting the Norwood Reaper. Replies include encouragement for further progress and advice on other treatments that can be used in conjunction with the current ones.

      community Just why? And why y'all excited still

      in Satire  514 upvotes 2 months ago
      The conversation discusses hair loss treatments, including minoxidil, finasteride, and dutasteride, with users sharing experiences and side effects. Some users express concerns about side effects like libido issues, while others mention alternative treatments like bee venom and dermarolling.

      community CB-03-01 supposed hair loss cure

      in Treatment  9 upvotes 5 years ago
      The conversation discusses why CB-03-01, a potential hair loss treatment, isn't widely discussed despite evidence of its effectiveness and safety. Some users mention other treatments like melatonin, procianidin b2, and RU58841, debating their effectiveness and safety.

      community Using topicals after hair transplant if safe to do so

      in Transplants  5 upvotes 2 weeks ago
      After a hair transplant, it's advised to stop using RU58841 and minoxidil to avoid irritation, resuming them 25-30 days post-surgery if the scalp is healed. The user is currently using finasteride, minoxidil, and RU58841, but there are concerns about the safety and efficacy of RU58841 in humans.